English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know the car mechanically was high maintence , but wasn't it worth the beautiful car? DId you let it go? Don't you think that the back and the front of the car where actually a step above the rest?

2007-10-09 21:38:41 · 4 answers · asked by mna 2 in Cars & Transportation Car Makes Nissan

4 answers

I worked at a Pontiac-Isuzu-Nissan dealer back then and loved those 300's...a little hard to get in and out of as I'm 6-3 but once you're in....too cool!! Great styling! Years before, I had an 86 Supra also and would pick the 300 any day over that..it had no bottom end power. John Paul sounds like he has a cool ride there.

2007-10-10 00:44:16 · answer #1 · answered by paul h 7 · 0 0

Z-32 lovers everywhere! There was something more solid looking about the 1990 to 1996 USA and 1999 Japan 300ZX's. Even if the 350Z is better in almost every way. I just compleated a 1991 300zx 2+2 NA to twin upgraded turbo conversion that makes over 485 rear wheel HP and 449 torque. Yes if well maintained and very expensive to repair but what a ride.

2007-10-10 00:25:03 · answer #2 · answered by John Paul 7 · 0 0

I preferred the 240Z, back in the 70s, but the twin turbos in the 90s were pretty cool too. I like the tacky tires, the way they would hug curves.

2007-10-09 21:47:49 · answer #3 · answered by LuckyChucky 5 · 0 0

yes yes yes yes! very sexy. my hommie had one that was morron like color with a body-kit ( nothing to ricey or flashy, just clean) and it was gorgeous, especially it being his first car at 16....lucky bastard!

2007-10-11 03:10:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers