2007-10-09 20:14:06 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No, at the time that was probably Egypt.
For liberal and modern earlier, you could have chosen the Lebanon, (before it disintegrated into religious factions)
And Iran (though not Arabic) prior to the US-engineered coup.in the 1950's and the reactive Islamic revolution in the1970's
"Illegal and disastrous invasion", I'll give you, bar the stray capital.
2007-10-09 20:30:55 · answer #1 · answered by Pedestal 42 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We do not know exactly but there are some proofs for this:
1) Tariq Aziz, a Christian Foreign Minister
2) Some people working ther have told that we were always respect there and government officer there were always thanking us for coming to their country for their progress. One of my Bangladeshi friend told me that once a senior inspector at the airport carried my bag. When I asked to take with respect. He said to me that you got eduction in your country and come to serve us and we must thank you. While in all other countries we are felt like load or being blessed for being allowed to be there.
3) Another strange thing he told that many time Saddam was visiting the areas by helicopter and wherever there was work going on he was landing and asking about work and about our welfare.
4) Saddam was arranging eating feasts where he was eating once and some times more that one with all people of the country.
As far some killings are concerned, traitors are alway killed by all countries and religions. Perhaps current killing is 1000times more than his. And perhaps for full peace that was not a big deal.
As far invasion of Kuwait he was wrong as per current situation but if you go back Kuwait was part of Iraq and separated by Britain from it.
Do not think that I have written this as being friend of Saddam. I am not his friend because he was enemy of Pakistan my country. And in 1971 he made a speech for help of India declaring that my tanks are ready to help you in your fight against Pakistan. Despite this I have written seen and listened facts.
Now you can decide about Iraq before invasion. Just check now and then??
2007-10-10 03:47:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes it was.
Their health care facilities were better than the USA.
They had no Weapons of Mass Destruction. (Bush lied to the whole world)
There was no Al Q@id@.
There was no Islamic Fanaticism.
Saddam did not harm a single American.
Most of the weapons that he used against the Iranians were supplied by the French and the Americans. (Same with 0sama - CIA supplied him and his cronies with arms when they were fighting the Soviets and even called them "Freedom Fighters")
The invasion of Iraq was illegal, and I see it as a War Crime.
2007-10-10 03:47:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I REALLY hope you're joking about the "liberal" part, the "illegal and disastrous" part, I fully agree with.
2007-10-10 03:23:08 · answer #4 · answered by Nebulous 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Maybe it was because of their liberal ways that the Religious Right and the Republican controlled US gov decided to attack it.
Hmmm... it all makes sense now.
And for the idiots out there, I was being sarcastic.
2007-10-10 03:24:58 · answer #5 · answered by NONAME 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Probably and Iran is not far behind it if people care to look beyond the Rhetoric
2007-10-10 03:48:30 · answer #6 · answered by LillyB 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i like u " illegal and disastrous invasion " SO TRUE SO TRUE
HUH...funny
proud Muslim girlll =]
2007-10-10 03:19:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Since this was posted in the religion and spiritual section. I would have to ask you to either consult your higher self, or post this in the politics setion.
2007-10-10 03:19:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋