Cambridge-educated Mr Tomlinson, 40, will give evidence supporting the claim by Harrods tycoon Mohamed Al Fayed that there was an Establishment plot to kill Diana to stop her marrying his son, Dodi, a Muslim.
.
2007-10-09 09:23:32 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Even within that hypothesis, "honor kill" isn't the right phrase, because any issues at stake would have been political. In those circles, nobody seemed to be successfully enforcing old-timey conceptions of "honor" ---more like hi-jinks.
2007-10-09 09:36:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Diana became into no longer an angel, and Charles isn't devil. this is ludicrous. They have been 2 unsuitable human beings, like maximum folk, and Diana had the added project of being immature and of coming from a stressful, volatile, kin history, which failed to do her any favors. The royal kin would not want yet another Diana. One became into greater advantageous than adequate. Middleton isn't an excellent splendor, yet Diana wasn't the two. As for calling Middleton "caught up" and a "b***h," whilst somebody has given in uncomplicated terms one interview to the clicking, this is probable ultimate -- and maximum clever -- to order judgment on what she is like. Diana on the different hand lived her existence very, very publicly, via her very own selection, and she or he "enable all of it dangle out" adequate that the first public have been given adequate training to make some stable judgments approximately her character. From my viewpoint, it wasn't stable.
2016-10-08 22:06:27 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It wouldn't have made any difference who she married in the end, anyway, even if he was a rich, debutant, muslim, whose father was good friends with the Queen. She wasn't next in line to be Queen anyway, considering she had an affair with the Prince, and that she left Charles for hired help, she was a celebrity in her own right, because she had the style, the glam, and the friends, but she would never make a good Queen, and that was what Queen Elizabeth thought, even though she was her daughter-in-law. I don't think she was murdered, because the Royal Family is very sacriligious, and the two Princes loved their "mummy" very dearly. I, also, feel very sorry for the two boys, in light of the fact, that the British Public will look on them very differently, now that Camilla is their stepmother. They won't have the privacy that they used to, with Diana, and they won't be as glamourous as they used to be.
2007-10-09 14:11:20 · answer #3 · answered by allspiceglitter 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know why people think the royal family would care. They;ve never exactly been known for religious extremeism, which is exactly what this conspiracy theory is accusing them of.
On top of which, Di was no longer part of the family. The evidence that Di would marry Dodi is spurious to say the least. And the actual facts of the crash strongly point to it being an accident, which makes the whole debate moot.
2007-10-09 10:04:57 · answer #4 · answered by Nightwind 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She probably knew all kinds of things about them and they were worried that she would go public. Also they wanted her out of the way as she was making them unpopular. They are way more popular now than they were the day before her death.
I don't think they cared much about religion. Diana was into odd spirituality stuff way before she met Dodi.
2007-10-09 09:37:51 · answer #5 · answered by Citizen Justin 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dodi a MUSLIM. What???come again.The man use to drink when was that seen as acceptable in Islam. He dated women when was that seen acceptable in Islam....I don't know why everyone refers to him as a Muslim.
Muslim by name but nothing in actions. no wonder non Muslim are getting mix messages about Islam when they look at Dodi
2007-10-09 09:41:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Fayed is a sham.
Consider this, he doe not deserve the honorific 'Al' He got that by changing his name by deed poll. This would be like changing my name from 'Simon T' to 'Lord Simon T' He effectively stole Harrods by using money that was not his to secure his purchase, and he broke into 'Tiny' Rowland's safety deposit box and stole the gems it contained.
He is a fake and what he says and claims have been repeatedly shown to be untrustworthy.
2007-10-09 09:36:32 · answer #7 · answered by Simon T 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I really doubt the Royal family themselves would have arranged it, but I wouldn't be surprised if some secret royal agency or something planned it. But I don't think it would've had anything to do with the queen herself
2007-10-09 09:35:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
no she wasnt aa princess anymore and of course people have been saying the whole conspiracy theory thing
charles is a member of the illuminati and they are secretly running everything
the queen had her killed cause she was gonna try to sue and get money
and dodi is hardly a muslim
since when is having girlfriends and getting drunk islamic?
2007-10-09 09:29:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
No, I don't believe that this is what happened. I believe that the driver had had too much to drink, was driving too fast to get away from the photographers, and made a fatal mistake.
2007-10-09 09:39:22 · answer #10 · answered by Grotty Bodkin is not dead!!! 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋