Why my Austrian ancestors had different first names in different reports? They knew writting and reading...?

Answer 1

Names changes as people moved to different countries like America. The people at Ellis Island sometimes couldn't understand how a person was speaking so they would improvise (sadly). Or if the immigrant wanted a new life, they would give a false name. Many different reason. My family came from Hungary, Austria and what is now Slovakia too, and I cannot find any of their villages. They wrote nothing down. I have no way to trace my family tree, to know of my cousins. On my grandfather's headstone, it reads LASCKO, on the death certificate it reads LACZKO. Same person!

Answer 2

One possibility is that if this is someone else's research they might have guessed based on limited information. I see this all the time on familysearch.org & rootsweb trees - especially for older "ancestors". Some people used only census info, and that can lead to some big errors as an uncle is as likely to name someone after his brother as his brother is to have a JR. Others get so excited to see a Mary Smith in the same state in 1800 that they decide she must be an ancestor!

On the other hand, there is the name change inherent in researching Catholic Records for names. That is the priest recording the baptismal information would give a Latinate version of the name in the record, which would often include a saint's name. So it would be a good idea to check the Saint for that birthday and see if there is your explanation.

Also many people changed their names in the US to blend in, Johann often became John, etc. The census was often filled in by the census workers - hence the big misspellings there.

So checking original documents (property records, probate, citizenship, marriage, etc.) that your ancestor signed is a great way to know their spelling, and the earlier the document was signed the closer it might be to their original name.

Answer 3

MY opinion is that you might have lost sight of the fact that your ancestor is normally not the person making the record in the first place.
If a church record, the minister or priest is the one preparing and entering the record. The county clerk prepares and enters the deed. Someone on the ship is the one who writes the list of passengers.
Consistency in names (as we know it today) was not always customary or needed in other times. If we don't match today on a computer search, the computer will spit it back. Not the same 300 yrs ago.
And even today, your name can appear different in records. What shows on your birth certificate "William John Jones", could easily appear in an obit as Billy John, if that is how most of your friends know you.

Answer 4

My German-speaking relatives in the 1800s usually had 3 given names for parents/grandparents and the christening sponsors: for example Johann Karl Erich.

Let's say the father was also Johann, so the family called the boy Karl. Everyone in the family would know him as Karl and his letters, census records and obit may say Karl -- but his legal first name *was* Johann so that will appear on legal documents and in church records.

Answer 5

This is an oft repeated question: there are lots of reasons. People like different spellings; mistakes are made; diliberate changes are made so as to not appear to be related to a particular person; it is lost in the translation (as from moving from one region/country to another.

Answer 6

Paul and James did not disagree; they're only writing from distinctive viewpoints. What you're seeing contained in the Scriptures that look contradictory are unquestionably cases the place human writers, guided via the Holy Spirit, are additionally seeing one difficulty from 2 distinctive angles. God would not choose a faith it extremely is empty and hypocritical. James 2 is talking approximately people who "say" that they have got faith yet haven't any works. subsequently, human beings can not tell in the event that they're genuine believers or not, because of the fact there is not any fruit. that style of a faith is ineffective and is not a saving faith. genuine faith leads to genuine works. In Matthew 19:sixteen-17, Jesus replaced into chatting with a legal expert who replaced into self-righteous and tried to place Him to the try (see additionally Luke 10:25). He asked what he could gain this as to acquire eternal existence and Jesus replied with the standards of conserving the commandments. If a individual retains each and all of the commandments, it might look that they could acquire eternal existence. besides the indisputable fact that, no one can save each and all of the commandments completely; atonment is often needed, or perhaps then it in common terms "covers" the sin -- which nevertheless maintains to be. subsequently, Jesus' comments coach the guy that justification can in common terms be via religion. it extremely is why Ephesians 2:8 says we are saved via grace with the aid of faith. additionally, Romans 3:20-28 and Galatians 2:sixteen tells us that no person is justified contained in the sight of God via the regulation; it extremely is, via the works that he can do. there is not any contradiction in any respect as quickly as we study the context of what each and each guy is asserting. we are justified via religion yet that faith could be ALIVE (James 2). The regulation (with consists of works) needless to say can not save us (Matthew 19:sixteen-17). subsequently, salvation is via grace with the aid of faith. p.s. -- a ways be it from me to call you a liar. I unquestionably have not chanced on you to be a liar in any of your questions. EDIT: (((((((shown Atheist))))))) We disagree, yet it extremely is wonderful.

Answer 7

my grandparents and my mom came from Austria and Hungary.i was told because of persecution some family members changed their names when they came to America.