It was noted that 'child abuse' was being defined as : "Men who abuse, women and children victims".
An anti-male agenda that would polarize the family, and totally ignore children who abuse themselves and others?
Why did this happen ?
2007-10-08 06:34:48 · 10 answers · asked by Caesar J. B. Squitti 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Following several complaints of child abuse agency abuses, it was noted that a provincially funded 'abuse' program was based on the 'half-truth'," men who abuse, women and children victims".
The panel was comprised of 7 female and one male social workers....
2007-10-08 06:40:53 · update #1
The issue is not violence, the issue is abuse, and violence is one form of abuse.
The inclusions of women as victims in a child abuse agency is another error.
Do you think there are forces in the world who 'hate' the traditional family unit ?
Truth can lie...when it is part of the truth......
http://www.thejesuschristcode.com
2007-10-08 06:55:02 · update #2
This happened because the majority of abuse cases are men abusing women and children, but I agree that is is an anti-male agenda sending the wrong message, because it is not always men. There are women who abuse their families and children that just have issues (not related to abuse by the parents).
2007-10-08 06:39:00 · answer #1 · answered by blue_girl 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
World War 2.
The "Greatest Generation" wasn't. They returned from WW2 with post traumatic stress syndrome to wives that had grown used to living without them and who sometimes had better jobs and made more money than they did.
It is no coincidence that the children of WW2 vets grew up to propose and pass spouse and child abuse legislation.
The returning Vets skewed the statistics for forty years and they are just now returning to more normal levels where the issue of men being primarily responsible for abuse is being challenged.
The answer, nutty as it sounds, is WW2.
2007-10-08 13:49:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
dr.clinard has a theory that women who abuse children are not prosicuted because most law enforcement agencies are run by men and men do not have the mental aptitude to prove a woman as abusive and often do not feel comfortable duscussing the issue in thier presence.
2007-10-08 13:45:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's a very good question. There are many women who abuse their own children too.
Men, as a whole, just seem to be angrier than women as a whole. That's been my experience anyway.
2007-10-08 13:38:55 · answer #4 · answered by free 1 indeed 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its all about money and job security not the true abused or abuser.
It is just like the American Cancer Society who takes all these donations for research and lines their pockets with it because if they really did find a cure they would lose their jobs. BTW there have been several cures for cancer that the ACS has rejected because they feared their jobs.
2007-10-08 13:39:51 · answer #5 · answered by Free Thinker 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Women can abuse their children and husbands.
But if a child abuses themselves or another child then it is therapy they need, not jail time.
2007-10-08 13:38:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
cz male rights have been ignored for too long in all the whining about the feminism and stuff
2007-10-08 13:37:44 · answer #7 · answered by mega_mover 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
First, you need to tell me, where was it so noted? With a link, please. Believe half of what you see and none of what you hear.
2007-10-08 13:38:23 · answer #8 · answered by claudiacake 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
idk? -.- maybe becuase of society and byt he way they dont ignore children who a buse themselves :D THEY BLAME THE PARENTS!
2007-10-08 13:38:10 · answer #9 · answered by Mollie 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your question makes no sense.
Try again...
2007-10-08 13:37:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋