America's founders accounted for natural rights as endowments of the Creator, grounding the claim that our rights are unalienable on the "self-evident" truth of the reality of God.
But in the atheist theory, man is simply a species of animal that happened to appear in a cosmic accident. Without a Creator, why should individual humans have unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, any more wolves, rattlesnakes, or trees?
2007-10-08
06:12:46
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Bruce
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Skalite, did you get to be a "top contributor" by avoiding the question?
Chris, most civilized societies don't recognize individual rights. Those that do, like the USA, have reason to believe in rights because they recognize the Creator ("In God we trust").
Windom, isn't Peter Singer the "ethicist" who thinks animals and people are equal? In other words, he rejects human rights.
Adam, you think rights are simply an expression of power? The Founders didn't deny rights to atheists because they understand that God endows unalienable rights to all people.
Eleventy, "any being" includes trees, right? Whether recognizing rights is a necessity is doubtful; it probably hobbles a society by outlawing workable solutions to problems.
Robin, if people created our rights, people can take them away. That means they aren't really unalienable.
2007-10-08
10:41:13 ·
update #1