With enthusiasm and profound ignorance!
Honestly, most of these people seem to have been asleep during grade 9 science class. They don't know the meaning of the word theory in a scientific context. If I had a nickel for every moron who said "evolution is just a THEORY so I don't have to believe it" I'd be rich.
What's worse is that they can't seem to grasp the simple concept that Evolution has NOTHING to do with the origins of life. That's Abiogenesis and it's a very new field of study.
So until creationists learn the VERY basic terms that scientists use and their meaning, their questions and answers will be very much like they and thier mytholgy are quickly becoming; utterly marginalized and ignored.
2007-10-08
05:26:50
·
32 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Cruz,
"Ok, down to business: Firstly, evolution is not a scientific theory per se. It was falsely given the status of a theory,"
And that's where I stopped reading.
Honestly, I'm surprised you only got 12 thumbs down. But you haven't recieved a thumbs up, meaning even the people who are on your side think your too stupid to support.
What's that tell ya genius ?
2007-10-08
08:47:10 ·
update #1
Well most virgins know more about sex if you ask me. I mean they usually at least have the basics right.
2007-10-08 05:35:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
Critical thinking skills are not evenly distributed within the human population. I suspect some people are completely unable to understand that which they don't "believe in." Uneducated people are limited to a very few ways of thinking -- mostly they are limited to agreeing with what already seems intuitively obvious. Educated people appreciate that many other people can also have good ideas too, and make an effort to learn a wide variety of different ways of thinking, many of which are far from intuitively obvious. What believers seem to be unable to appreciate is that their ignorance is painfully obvious to the rest of us and discredits every word they say. Once a virgin has sex, they're not a virgin anymore and, once a believer gets a good education, they can seldom remain a believer. Faith, like virginity, critically depends on maintaining one's ignorance of reality.
2007-10-08 06:05:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Diogenes 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I find it rather amusing most of the time. You can tell those who are just repeating what they've heard from those who've actually taken the time to do their own research into evolution, abiogenesis, and the big bang theory.
I've seen so often how some say we evolved from monkeys; I'm wondering if others will take up the mantra that evolutionists believe humans came from rocks and chemicals.
2007-10-08 05:36:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by OPad 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
My virgin boyfriend knows more about sex than my nympho ex-girlfriend. But I get your point, so I suppose it's true.
2016-05-18 23:53:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
At least a virgin usually knows how sex actually works.
A creationist has no clue at all about science and truth.
2007-10-08 05:50:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Yes, but there are probably a few very well-informed virgins out there too.
2007-10-08 05:32:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by blooz 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes, it's like they're bragging about their prowess when actually they have had no experience of it at all. Pretending they know science and they are rejecting it but in reality they know nothing of science.
2007-10-08 05:32:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
100 percent correct.
Only when your looking at porn and you type in "Creationist", there isnt a whole lot of good material.
2007-10-08 06:27:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
eh.. I will say the same as everyone else. Well put. heres your star =)
2007-10-08 05:52:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lorena 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yeah - of course, that's how they talk about sex too.
The difference is that most virgins actually WANT to know about sex, whereas "religious" people simply don't want to hear anything if it isn't specifically calculated to resonate with their programming.
2007-10-08 05:37:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
11⤊
2⤋