Couldn't some of those skull simply be from extinct apes.
Is the entire Evolution theory hanging on to those skulls?
Written and archeology finds shows us that human history and civilization is only about 5500 years old. The oldest been Mesopotamia "The Cradle of Civilization" which began in the region in about 3500 BC.
These findings support the history of the Bible more than they do Evolution.
2007-10-08 03:16:45 · 8 answers · asked by sfumato1002 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You know what supports evolution? Pretty much every major field of science. Geology, geography, history, botany, zoology, medicine, linguistics, archaeology, anthropology, palaeontology, etc., etc.
EDIT: To the above poster: Lucy is a 40% or so complete skeleton. The knee joint found a couple of miles away was from a different individual of a different species in a different strata. If you used anyone other than Kent "Incarcerated" Hovind or AIG as a source, you'd know that.
2007-10-08 03:25:00 · answer #1 · answered by Doc Occam 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
So your argument is that the bible, written after the first civilization, talks about the time line of the first civilization accurately? Do you see why this isn't a very strong argument for the bible. The fossil record is part of a huge amount of evidence to support evolution. There is no scientific evidence to support the bible.
If I started a religion which talks about the Super Bowl, and I accurately describe who won the first Super Bowl, would you follow my religion?
2007-10-08 10:31:04 · answer #2 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Law has nothing to do with science. The truth exists whether or not any human or so called law knows it. The legal profession has little to do with truth. The Bible has nothing to do with science. Evolution has no conflict with God. Only certain people dislike the idea. The more uneducated the person is in the realm if science the more they have a distaste for evolution. The trust remains the truth nonetheless.
2007-10-08 10:26:44 · answer #3 · answered by odinsacolyte 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While human 'civilisation' may only be about 5500 years old, humans have been around for rather longer than that.
Cave paintings for example show a degree of culture 40,000 to 20,000 years ago and the genetic evidence points to humans originating about 200,000 years ago.
Somewhat undermines a biblical time line starting 6,000 - 10,000 years ago, don't you think?
.
2007-10-08 10:48:36 · answer #4 · answered by Wood Uncut 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Is the entire Evolution theory hanging on to those skulls?"
No. It doesn't. There's plenty of other fossils and other evidence.
http://www.talkorigins.org
2007-10-08 10:21:11 · answer #5 · answered by Robin W 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
theres much more to evolution than a few fossils
radiocarbon dating and DNA evidence for a start
all of this would certainly prove evolution and does
2007-10-08 10:20:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Why, do you want to sue Darwin?
2007-10-08 10:22:40 · answer #7 · answered by remy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are from extinct apes....that's kinda the point, sparky.
2007-10-08 10:25:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋