Iran's not going to be attacked any time soon.
But assuming they were and the Australian government decided to send troops, expect it to be like a repeat of the Iraq Invasion - pretty much just the special forces going in early, with support staff and the occasional rotation of specific companies from Battalions in the Royal Australian Regiment being sent in afterwards for security.
The light Australian casualties is the cause of more of an unwillingness to see good Diggers getting killed overseas. Some other countries with a bit more of a population and better aircraft and heavy armor are more willing to see anywhere from a few dozen to a few thousand buying the farm.
2007-10-07 20:57:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gotta have more explosions! 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I wish I could jump on your bandwagon of using time spent in training as a more important factor than the quality of said training, but today isn't your day buddy. I haven't been through Aussie Spec Ops training, but I've worked with them and they were great guys. Bottom line, don't assume that because they are in training longer that they're automatically better at the job than someone who went through a more time-efficient program. They never die in Iraq and Afghanistan? What's your source for this information? Has it occured to you that there are many less Aussie Spec Ops vs. American Spec Ops in the GWOT? The percentage may actually be close to the same, even though the number itself could be lower.
2007-10-07 20:47:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by NunyaBizzness 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Assuming Iran is attacked, by whom? The Iraqis, the Saudis, the Israelis, the Georgians, the Turks, or New Zealand? Knowing the thoughts of the Aussie General Staff, their objective will be to spend as much time in Sidney, Melbourne, Adelaide, yes Adelaide, as possible.
2007-10-07 20:52:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by johny0802 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Apart from posting a "statement" praising the abilities of the Australian Armed Forces, where is your connection / proof of an impending attack on Iran including the involvement of Australian Forces????
2007-10-07 21:56:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by conranger1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obama is extremely understand-how whilst it is composed of the Muslim worldwide. he won't do something because of the fact each and every thing the Muslim worldwide places do, he's in complete sync with them. he's on their area and Iran's. he's finding forward to seeing Iran attack Israel and not do something approximately it yet state to individuals " i discover this to be unacceptable". on the comparable time he will want a communicate with Iran and bow right down to him first. What a humorous tale and shame he's to united statesa..
2016-10-21 10:20:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Aussie's aim is devoutly follow all policies set by the great United States of America
And make sure they would get some spoils of war in Iran
2007-10-07 20:52:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by RPG-7 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
an attack on Iran would more likely target nuclear plants with heavy bombers and cruise missles I doubt many ground forces would be involved
2007-10-07 20:55:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Will 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
To back up the little shrub (aka bush) push for oil and nothing else. We should not be there.
2007-10-07 20:54:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
australian troops are superior to the retarded american troops. It is a fact. deal with it if you disagree.
2007-10-07 23:30:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by sexc_n_h0rny_now 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Better trained than the "Yanks" ? You wish !
2007-10-07 20:47:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋