No one will ever agree with everything another says, that's the human condition.
2007-10-07 20:26:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Victoria Sparda 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The website is not to be trusted. Example: The guy's son was at a "Camporee" Boy Scout function when some other Scouts refused to play with his group. It is painted as an "incidence of prejudiec against whites"... The problem is that what the guy's son was told was "We don't play with you - different culture" - not "you are white". Sort of like how certain others won't associate with those of other cultures - because it is a DIFFERENT CULTURE; a person can be born in Germany, live their entire life in Germany, be a product of the German Culture - and be a GENETIC African. See how words have been twisted to fit what the author wants them to say?
I bet he does the same thing with the words of Scientists and others on his "truthful" website.
If the man tells just one lie or half-truth, he cannot be trusted to EVER tell the complete truth. He should never be believed just because he says he can be believed. He has told a lie on his website...therefor none of it is to be believed.
2007-10-07 20:47:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by archerdude 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The website is for faux-pas science, and is not accredited to any reputable society. It's just another way of herding the sheep. Take it at face value, and it sounds like a great argument, but it will crumble under the slightest probe from a real scientist.
2007-10-07 20:22:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by rawlings12345 4
·
8⤊
2⤋
Excellent resource for what? Anyone who considers Harry Potter or Pokemon a Christian Issue does not have anything worthwhile to say. I am Christian and I think some of the stuff on this site is a parody of my faith. Invaluable for comedic material maybe.
2007-10-07 20:24:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Aletheia 3
·
6⤊
4⤋
Who ever wrote it has no real clue about what they are talking about. Not in theology or in science.
I gave their analyses of Pascal's wager a glance and they are totally clueless. Sorry.
If you use anything off that site in an honest debate you will lose badly.
So think real hard about what they claim and then go to original sources.
2007-10-07 20:28:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Y!A-FOOL 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
I've no doubt it will be hated by most atheists, agnostics and false religions (Mormons, JWs, Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Judaists and evolutionists)
So - long may it live.
2007-10-07 20:43:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by cheir 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
This seems to be a personal blog: and nothing wrong with that, except it is "personal" and not the wisdom of a group.
///
2007-10-07 20:23:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Iain 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
Those guys want to squash science to fit into their religious view.
They wouldn't know the scientific method if it bit them.
2007-10-07 20:30:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dalarus 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
That's a laughable website, and typical of those who try to discredit evolution in favor of creationism or intelligent design.
2007-10-07 20:25:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Frank 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
why limit the question to chrisitans? the site is bunk
2007-10-08 12:42:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by justme 2
·
0⤊
0⤋