English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

19 answers

It's all the same. Yes a ho is a ho is a ho.

2007-10-08 00:31:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The big difference is............................
Expectations and. Assumptions

When you invite a girl to dinner, she Assumes you will want sex but counts on the fact that it is wrong for you to Expect it. After shelling out $100 feeding her, you Expect sex and Assume she will oblige you.

When you pay a girl $100 for sex, you both Expect to have sex, leaving no room for vague Assumptions.

Here is Nevada, prostitution is legal, and while many are quick to pass judgment (as they have answering this question) they will be hard pressed to deny it's business strength. Many a shrewd business woman who realizes that a lot of men feel the way you do have decided to take the guess work out of the age old difference between men's and woman's Expectations and Assumptions in this area. Those same woman however, will laugh at you if you start to get all "romantic" and attached.......then they will remind you of the prices for their services.

2007-10-07 19:53:49 · answer #2 · answered by Kimmers 2 · 0 0

When you buy her dinner, there's usually no agreement ahead of time. Meaning she hasn't committed to have sex with you. Which means it's not a payment. Just a gesture. So, if she still has sex with you after wards, it's because she likes you. I don't think women really feel any obligation to put out after a fancy meal.

Honestly, Even if I went out with you thinking you were so damn hot and figuring the night would end like that, if it became known to me during the dinner that you *expected* something, then you're not going to get it. Even if you think you deserve it or have paid for it. I think most women would agree with that.

2007-10-07 19:12:44 · answer #3 · answered by Priscilla B 5 · 0 0

Taking a woman out for dinner implies a level of respect.

Paying for it straight up, means yeah, you'll get it, but there's no respect involved.

It depends what you want, some whore who takes money for sex and just does it with any guy who pays cash? You won't get a decent girl or woman, this way. Decent girls and women expect respect.

If you want some whore, yeah, pay for it, straight.

If that makes you happy in life, fine.

Most people find that they want more than just sex, in the end.

2007-10-07 19:11:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

depends on the girl. and the relationship you have. a $100 dinner is MUCH more respectable than just giving her $100 cash. the first way she is classy respectable. the second she is just an item.

2007-10-07 19:09:11 · answer #5 · answered by l4courtney 2 · 0 0

giving her $100 cash for sex?
surely that is payment for service
but buying her dinner for it..
it shows that u have more courtesy.. and spending time with her after the sex would mean a lot to her..I THINK

2007-10-07 19:08:16 · answer #6 · answered by goujing 2 · 1 0

giving a woman $100 for sex means she's a whore & prolly cant refused yr offer else her pimp gets mad. Buying a woman a $100 dinner does not guarantee that she'll sleep with u. She has a choice to say "No, not tonight,,,i got a headache!!!!' hehehe,,,hope that helps

2007-10-07 19:09:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

$100 for sex is a prostitute
$100 for dinner is a good date!

2007-10-07 19:22:31 · answer #8 · answered by Bren 7 · 1 0

gving 100 for sex is good for boy becuse even after eating ameal of 100 dollar she amy not give sex so why waste 100 dollars for dinner

2007-10-07 19:13:58 · answer #9 · answered by PHD 4 · 0 0

She might not want to waste 100 dollars on food its better to have fast cash.

2007-10-07 19:09:27 · answer #10 · answered by Beautiful_Princess 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers