Trying to get some ideas on what to look into. Looking into the Kahr PM9 and the MK9 (.40cal) also the Springfield-Armory XD Sub Compact (.40cal) Any Suggestions?
2007-10-07 11:38:07 · 14 answers · asked by Narf 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Out of those you listed I would go for the Springfield. You may also want to look into a Ruger SP101 if this is your first handgun. It's a revolver but with my experience with them they have always been pretty good for me. And make sure you get proper training and practice with whatever firearm AND mode of carry you choose.
2007-10-07 11:49:47 · answer #1 · answered by crop13b 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Snub nose 357.
Several years ago there was one advertised in one of the gun mags I used to read. My hand covered all but about a 1/4 inch on the grip. It was a little bigger than a snub nose .38.
Great power for a small weapon.
If you are going to be carrying a weapon why get one that:
1. Has low stopping power. Unless you are a competition shooter, then use the .22 you'll be a dead shot with it at that point so it wont matter. And very small recoil means fast accurate shots.
2. Watch the size of it. If its to large it could get snagged or become difficult to move in a hurry. Long barrels are better for longer range. Would not recommend putting it in your pocket, BTW. Bad things would happen if it was accidentally discharged, not to mention possibly shot off.
3. Easy to operate. Revolver vs. Automatic. Depends on your beliefs on this one. I like both for different reasons or situations.
Revolvers harder to jam fast to reload as long as the speed loaders are all ready loaded. Autos faster to reload in a hurry and more ammo.
4. How it's going to be concealed. Shoulder, ankle, hip, small of your back, under the bar.
All would adjust the max size of the weapon. Personally take something small, light, and easy to move with and not very complex to operate.
2007-10-07 22:07:16 · answer #2 · answered by blade_lord 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I own a Ruger Super Blackhawk .44 Magnum revolver. It's worthless as a concealed weapon. Just too damned big and powerful. I own it simply because I like it and enjoy taking it to a shooting range. That power does feel good in my hand. But I repeat, it's worthless as a self-defense weapon. With a 7-1/2" barrel, it takes too long to draw.
I also own a Walther .380. Nice, small weapon, easily concealable. Power isn't that particularly great. And with that caliber, I'd have to worry about being arrested if I killed someone, or sued if I shot him and he didn't die.
So, for best concealed carry, I prefer the Beretta .22LR. Ammo is cheap. Looks mean enough to stop someone when they see it, powerful enough to back it up if they call my bluff. Plus, if the first round doesn't do the job, I've got 7 more in a normal clip to finish the job.
That way, if I ever do find myself in front of a jury, I can make it believable that I only carried it for self-defense, because it wasn't a large caliber and I didn't have a super-size clip.
The only people who tell you that size matters are the ones with no experience. And that goes for women, too. It looks good, it's fun to play with, but worthless when it counts.
2007-10-07 12:06:48 · answer #3 · answered by Marc X 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Everyone will probably disagree but for a concealed weapon I would go small, a 22 cal auto such as the Firestorm 22 by Bersa. this weapon will fit easily into your back pocket for maximum concealment. If you carrying a concealed weapon and you need it it's probably a very close encounter, a 22 will do the trick. Bersa also makes a 380 that is quite compact if you want a little more power.
2007-10-07 11:56:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In Canada we don't carry concealed guns at any age. Just like most civilized nations.
2016-05-18 02:45:15 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whatever you carry, practice and get good with it. A gun is useless, if you don't have the proficiency and frame of mind to use it effectively when the need arises.I would NOT get any of those mini easy to conceal guns like the subcompacts. Yes, they are easy to hide, but hard to hit anything with.
2007-10-08 00:00:25 · answer #6 · answered by WC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For self-defense, a snub-nosed .38 special should be adequate, loaded with Glaser saftey slugs.
2007-10-07 11:46:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A Kel-Tec .380 is hard to beat on the size to power ratio.
2007-10-07 13:46:00 · answer #8 · answered by uknowmeasjoey 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you want it to do any good, a .44 Magnum. Then when they get hit, they know it.
Check all laws, get all permits, and, if necessary, get the proper training.
2007-10-07 11:41:54 · answer #9 · answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depending on your risk exposure, skill, etc. the M1911 or one of its numerous compatibles is also a good choice.
2007-10-07 12:24:17 · answer #10 · answered by knoodelhed 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋