English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-07 10:10:56 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Languages

6 answers

Standing alone, it does mean 'they were', but it is also used to form the past perfect tense, passive voice. Where in English we would say 'They had been heard', Latin would have 'Auditi erant'. Used with a past participle, it actually translates to 'they had'.

2007-10-07 11:01:02 · answer #1 · answered by Rosa L 6 · 2 2

That's THEY WERE in the imperfect tense, which is our past tense. You see the ERANT alone because they don't need to put THEY along. so THEY WERE is in one word ERANT.

2007-10-07 10:14:32 · answer #2 · answered by Kool J. B. 4 · 2 0

Brava Rosa!

2007-10-07 13:12:00 · answer #3 · answered by Sabrina(Susananita) 6 · 0 0

hello

2016-10-08 04:12:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

they were

2007-10-07 11:53:14 · answer #5 · answered by DavidausZueri 3 · 0 0

they were

2007-10-07 10:13:35 · answer #6 · answered by James O 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers