Fellow agnostics: how do you define your agnosticism?

Question

Just curious. I tend to believe that there is some higher power, but generally, who or what created life doesn't care if we ponder his/her/their existence, but instead follow our consciences and try to be positive. What I love about not belonging to a church anymore is that I feel free to define myself, not let a religion tell me what I should and shouldn't believe.

Those who say that agnostics really are just athiest are mostly wrong. As far as I am concerned anyway. I wish I could say without a shadow fo a doubt in my mind that there is or isn't a God, but I need proof, either way; which is impossible.

Answer 1

For me I try not to define myself into any category that puts a box around me. As I age and meet people and learn things my ideals of my religion changes in small portions. I can appreciate people that put their trust and beliefs into God, but for me I can't do that. I put my trust into myself and follow my moral and ethical beliefs. I don't follow the whole heaven and hell ideas but more in a karma system. That what goes around comes around. About making yourself happy and then you can help to enrich the lives of others around you. To do no harm to others and to laugh of the stress of things at the end of the day.

Answer 2

While I don't believe in a 'personal' 'creator' god that many others do, I do see a 'pattern' to existence, as if we are part of something larger than ourselves.

I accept that it is well demonstrated that people are likely to 'see' what they expect. So my perception that some choices in life just feel 'right' and work out well, whereas others feel 'wrong' may well just be a cognitive bias.

However I do find the idea of Tao (the 'flow' of the universe, or the force behind the natural order that keeps the universe 'balanced') attractive. I also subscribe to the view that, by harmonising ones actions with tao, success (and a happy life) will result, on the basis that I have found this to be so.

As to what Tao 'is', how it came to be, or even whether it actually exists at all, I don't believe that these are questions that can be answered. I therefore choose to spend my energies elsewhere rather than pondering such things.

But 'Tao' seems to work for me.
.

Answer 3

I'm like Spirit Wanderer, an atheistic agnostic. I believe that a higher power is remotely possible, but I don't think it would be the one worshiped by any of the religions in existence. But personally, I don't think there is a god. So I'm not sure what that makes me... I hope my explanation made sense. Usually, I just call myself an atheist, since it's easier to explain.

Answer 4

Agnosticism is the only rational choice when presented with the two extremes of atheism and deism. Both of the extremes require faith. Since you can never prove either of them wrong (the same way you can't disprove that I don't have invisible leprechauns in my cupboards), it is only logical to acknowledge the possibility.

If there is a higher power, he is definately a "hands-off" sort of creater and isn't very relevant to my day to day life.

The existence or non-existence of a creator would not change the way that I live my life. I think that is the essence of what I believe.

Answer 5

I'm not agnostic but more of a cross between agnostic and atheist...as in, I don't believe in any god but I know that there is a chance (however small) of some higher power out there. The only higher power I believe in is nature, and I say that because no matter how powerful we become, we can always be knocked back on our a55es by a storm or something. And I agree with your view. We should do the right thing because it's right, not to get something out of it, or to try and get out of punishment...just my opinion. Hope this helps! ^_^

Answer 6

If you are worried about a religion having boundaries and now you find yourself free from them, Then the only true boundary was the Law of LOVE and this dept we should never quit paying. What your worry should be is if your Name will be found written in the Lamb's Book of Life, or not. Religion can not write your name within it's pages and whosoever name was not found written in the book of life was cast alive into the lake of fire..Revelation 20:15..There is only ONE WAY to get your name written there...And the title over a Church one belongs neither qualifies them rights into the book of life,,

Answer 7

nicely I used to call myself agnostic, yet on reflection, that replaced into extra to circumvent offending my kinfolk too very much (all born lower back fundamentalist evangelicals who little doubt nonetheless pray for me) i'm not boastful adequate to assert that i comprehend there is not any god, to any extent further than i comprehend however if or not there is clever existence different than in the worldwide. i think of the possibilities of there being a god as defined via bible believers is vanishingly small, and the possibilities of there being clever existence additionally small, yet statistically extra achievable. it somewhat is a great universe, and it somewhat is interior the realm of my mind's eye to settle for that there could be some creature who could be sufficiently stepped forward that we would interpret it as a god. like the "Q" on celebrity Trek next era, as an occasion. An agnostic standpoint says that we will not possible comprehend one way or the different, and that to dedicate to the two end of the spectrum makes no sense. i stumble on that to be a vulnerable, wishy-washy argument, and that i've got deserted it for a extra classic skeptical atheist standpoint. in case you think some thing, and prefer me to believe it, teach me a reason to different than faith is all I request. so some distance as God of the bible (gods? by no potential particular with that trinity nonsense), or Allah of the qu'ran, or those of the Greeks or the Norse...this is a various subject. i'm a a hundred% hardcore atheist approximately those gods. in only the comparable way, and for the comparable reasons as each and each of those faith practitioners is atheistic approximately the different god yet their very very own.

Answer 8

The word "agnostic" was coined in the 19th century by the atheist Thomas Huxley to qualify his atheism. He did not believe in gods but said it was impossible to know whether gods existed or not. Agnostic means "not knowing". Many theists claim to know their gods exist ("I know that my redeemer liveth") and Huxley was pointing out that this cannot be the case. You can believe in gods but you can never know they exist. Similarly you can not believe in gods but you can never know they can't exist.

Agnostics in the 19th century were atheists and true agnostics still are. Those who are undecided or having a bet each way are not really agnostics even though they name themselves so.

Answer 9

I define my agnosticism thus: That pervert Moses and his syphilitic half-brother Aaron invented a god for political purposes; and whole Bible scenario is grotesque, including the part where Jesus rose into the sky and became a god.

If you know of a real god tell me about it. The one in the Bible is a sorry specimen.

Answer 10

No offence,but most agnostics seem to be fence-sitters to me;one foot in disbelief so they dont look completely stupid to those that dont believe,and one foot in faith just in case.God says theese type people will be considered just as though they were complete atheist.When it come to God,there is no fence sitting,you're for Him or against Him;no middle ground.