2007-10-07 03:27:33 · 11 answers · asked by Psychological Moment 5 in Travel ➔ Africa & Middle East ➔ Israel
Ok, I know it is a sensitive issue. Each side claims the same thing. I won't dig into history, nor will bring some old corps to the light.
I would ask a simple question. Choose the countries among these whose got an accupied lands:
USA, Jordan, Egypt, Israel, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine.....
I know your position is not that easy at all; if you give back the occupied Arabic lands, including the Palestinain one, you should still feel threatened to be fought because you don't feel the Arabs would be consent even with your presence in Arabia, and then they will support another terrorist organizations to bug you.. So ...
I think there is one solution; take the land Balfor Declaration gave you first at the beginning, then live and let live, no one will bug you anymore
2007-10-07 08:21:14 · update #1
Although i tell you frankly, i don't see how there would be peace in these lands... there is always two sides fighting and conspiring; maybe we are doomed to this plague forever
2007-10-07 08:26:38 · update #2
That's cos a lot of rich americans are Jewish so they need them to support the US economy.
2007-10-07 03:33:32 · answer #1 · answered by kang1972ad 2 · 9⤊ 6⤋
Because some people have very misguided views of the world, and incorrectly understand the situation.
Historically, Israel hasn't been the aggressor, just the victor - which are not the same thing.
EDIT: excuse me, but you said 'aggressor', not occupier. Those are two very different things. Israel became an occupier in a DEFENSIVE war, i.e. not the aggressor. That Israel triumphed does not make it the aggressor as I said before, just the victor.
2007-10-07 13:00:59 · answer #2 · answered by Michael J 5 · 5⤊ 5⤋
Because your question is based a false premise which is Israel is the "aggressor." Israel is not the "aggressor" here as is well known - what the reality is that it is the Islamic states that have an aggressive attitude towards spreading their faith that is the problem. Why aren't more Islamic states like the Turks, Egyptians, and Jordanians (and I could list more that fall into this Moderate camp)? If the Palestinians and their supporters were not the aggressors they would have accepted the UN Partition plan back in 1947-48. When will those we call "Islamofacists" end their ways of hate and move to a path of peace? When will the leadership in Tehran end its saber rattling?
Good Luck!!!
2007-10-07 11:55:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 7⤋
What a way to make a lie seem true!
Just listen to what the Arabs say, rather than what you would like to be. Including the Arabs who answer your question.
The truth should be obvious to everyone who wants to know it. Arab countries have never abandoned the dream of destroying Israel; they still cherish it today. Having time and again failed to achieve their evil goal with military means, they decided to fight Israel by proxy.
For that purpose, they created a terrorist organization, cynically called it "the Palestinian people" and installed it in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria. How else can you explain the refusal by Jordan and Egypt to unconditionally accept back the "West Bank" and Gaza, respectively?
The fact is, Arabs populating Gaza, Judea, and Samaria have much less claim to nationhood than that Indian tribe that successfully emerged in Connecticut with the purpose of starting a tax-exempt casino: at least that tribe had a constructive goal that motivated them. The so called "Palestinians" have only one motivation: the destruction of Israel, and in my book that is not sufficient to consider them a “nation" -- or anything else except what they really are: a terrorist organization that will one day be dismantled.
In fact, there is only one way to achieve peace in the Middle East. Arab countries must acknowledge and accept their defeat in their war against Israel and, as the losing side should, pay Israel reparations for the more than 50 years of devastation they have visited on it. The most appropriate form of such reparations would be the removal of their terrorist organization from the land of Israel and accepting Israel's ancient sovereignty over Gaza, Judea, and Samaria. That will mark the end of the "Palestinian people."
And only then will peace be achievable.
.
2007-10-07 13:35:09 · answer #4 · answered by Ivri_Anokhi 6 · 2⤊ 7⤋
You obviously read and watch propoganda . If you have any common sense you would think for your self. Go see the movie "Children Of Men" maybe after seeing that movie you might understand the situation a lot better. Please give some details what do you mean Isreal the agressor. Let us see how your mind works. I'll be waiting for your additions.......
2007-10-07 14:08:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
The aggressor of what?
Are you trying to say that in Israel's war against terrorist groups that present an existential threat to them they are not allowed to do something about it?
As is the case, since Israel is a pro American democracy then it should be a no brainer as to why the US supports them.
2007-10-07 13:57:45 · answer #6 · answered by BMCR 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
US and Lebanon have poor diplomatic relations.
2007-10-07 10:35:23 · answer #7 · answered by lobervoy 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
because the CRF controls the media, and most of the members of CFR just happen to be jewish
2007-10-07 11:59:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 5⤋
Good question.
2007-10-07 10:34:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 4⤋
bcuz they both have the same goals: to destroy muslims
2007-10-07 15:08:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋