My brother said they would be called "intelligent". lol
2007-10-06 18:07:13 · 12 answers · asked by Enigma®Ragnarökin' 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I think that would qualify as pantheism.
2007-10-06 18:12:46 · answer #1 · answered by Gawdless Heathen 6 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Pantheist, Pantheists acknowledge that the Universe is our Creator since we all sprang from it. Any life-force that exists is completely natural and in accordance physical laws. Science is not at odds with this belief, quite the contrary. The more we learn, the closer we get to the truth.
Why should we struggle to believe ridiculous old fables when we have real life mysteries to try and wrap our minds around? We have all of nature and the cosmos to awe and inspire us, mystical beings are not necessary.
Pantheist
2007-10-07 10:00:29 · answer #2 · answered by Equinoxical ™ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would agree with Jesus Myth-Superstar. The most well known pantheistic system of modern philosophy is that of the great philosopher, Baruch Spinoza. He is often referred to as the god A. Einstein believed in. Einstein was an Atheist, but in his day this had even worse connotations than it does in our day. He was constantly being badgered by theists demanding him to state his position on god. At one point he stated that he believed in 'Spinoza's God." This is why some people say that he was a theist. I don’t recall his exact words, but they were very similar to the ones used in your question.
2007-10-06 19:05:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
forget religion - religion is Spiritual fraud; Universal Truth eliminated religion from Spirituality; Accomplish this: Create a Private, Personal, Direct, Divine Relationship with Our Creator and save Your Soul from religion's and atheist's beliefs and start Your journey back home, to Heaven. <<<<<<< UnConditional Love is the only answer >>>>>>> Love and Believe in Our Creator; Love and Believe in Yourself. Only with Our Creator's Love and Peace will we be Truly Free!
2016-05-17 23:06:39 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. That is kinda like me I guess, although I think this energy is intelligent.
2007-10-07 14:46:04 · answer #5 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All I know is to call "it" the collective consciousness. Each of us taken together equals the whole. We are just little pieces of it. Or, little cells of the whole.
2007-10-07 05:31:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, you could be getting caught up in labels at that point.
Brahma, the Tao, the Divine - they're only shades of understanding. I'd just go with spiritual.
Peace and (((hugGs)))
2007-10-06 18:24:38 · answer #7 · answered by Orpheus Rising 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes. I just say I'm "agnostic, spiritual." I also refer to myself as a "Freethinker." Freethought is a philosophy rather than a religion.
2007-10-06 19:59:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
papadego has got it right. but there's also others in eastern spiritualism that consider energy to have personal qualifications.
2007-10-06 18:12:43 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm not aware of any name for such beliefs, but it's what I believe.
I've never needed a name for it
2007-10-06 18:11:59 · answer #10 · answered by Jack P 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋