Do you think the Big Bang theory disproves God or His role as Creator?

Question

Why? Why not?

Answer 1

No...I think its impossible to look at the complexity of creation and believe it happened on accident

Psalm 19
1The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.

Answer 2

I personally do not believe in the "Big Bang theory" for the simple reason that all the marvelous things that we have in this universe could not just come together because of a huge bang. Let's take something as simple as a flower for instance. Do you think that a flower could teach itself how to adapt to create it's own food? If you say no, then who did? the bang? and if you say yes then when was the last time you saw a mass of matter turn into something intelligent on its own? Let's take a look at the human body. The bones are all connected in such a way that the body is able to move and operate well. If i took the parts of a car and laid them in an open area for 5 million years would they change into a car? how about anything else? why not a lot of very intelligent people say that is what happened to all existing people and animals.

Read Genesis 1 and you can email me if you have any other questions or complaints. just add me as a fan and then you'll have my email!

Hope i helped you out ♥

P.S. If i believed in it then the big bang theory would still not disprove the existance of my LORD.

Answer 3

No it doesn't, what was before the big-bang? God! It was him who made everything, including the so called big bang if it happened!

This is a recent theory so it couldn't have been on the Bible on the time it was written, but it does not disprove God in any way, He's the Lord, the one who's always been and will ever be!

Answer 4

Dear isthatso,

The Big Bang Theory does not disprove God or his role as a Creator. First the Big Bang is just a theory- and is based on the premise that a bunch of elements randomly combined together leading to a Big Bang- and from simple observation (everything from the simplest of atoms) to the human body- there is a lot of things in Creation that point to order and intelligent design- which lends strong support for an intelligent Creator behind Creation.

While those who are against Creation will attack the idea of "blind faith" in a Creator- how can people believe in a Creator they've never seen? It also takes a great degree of blind faith to believe that a BIG BANG caused the universe to be. Scientists have not been able to re-create a BIG BANG and i think as we look at Creation we see it as a "one time event" where the circumstances surrounding it can not be re-created. One side points to a Big Bang, the other side points to a Creator.

In answering your question i think my bottom line point is that the Big Bang is a theory with a lot of holes in it and definitely does not disprove the possibility or the notion that the world and universe could be created by a Creator (God) as the Bible states. That whole debate is a whole other question- but from examining both the Big Bang and Creation i find more evidence for Creation than for the Big Bang.

Hope that helps. Kindly,

Nickster

Answer 5

good question, but I got no answers when I asked a similar one, so lets break it down.
big bang starts out with nothing or something, and for no reason violates all the laws of physics, conservation of energy, the laws of thermodynamics, and something at rest, without a reason explodes.

Then out of this relative small amount of matter everything comes.

The encyclopedia britannica, notes that when the universe began, time/space existed and before that, it did not. No one, whether a supporter of big bang or not, denies that point.

Research into the isotopes of the earth, basalts specifically, show an abundance of (if I remember) PO2, which has a 3 day half life.

In cosmology, the idea is that the sun (protostar configuration) in a nebula under the influence of gravity, pulled in enough hydrogen that under pressure, it began to fuse creating our star. The resulting solar wind and heat, drove off the lighter elements, leaving earth, mars, venus, mercury to have the basalt type structures.

The problem involved with the burn off of lighter compounds to leave the heavier ones is that the isotopes would not have existed long enough to be found 4.6 billion years later.

There are other problems, but again, availability of computer ram is a problem as is the readers attention span.

the earth, is anywhere from 7 to 10 thousand years old. It was however created 4.6 billion years old, based on redshift from distant stars. There are some other very interesting fact relating to the energy change in light, (the photon) that suggest an early or young earth.

The difference between big bang and God speaking the universe into existance is that big bang leaves God out, though I've yet to read anywhere that God did not exist, and creation says God did the work himself.

much of science is not opposed to God, only that God could be involved or active in his creation, hense, not god in science.

it has been a while since I was trying to keep up with the young earth studies, and I hate trying to read through technical papers when I'm distracted. if you need, I can try to dig up the stuff I studied and post that for references. I'm thinking you can find a lot of it on line now.

Answer 6

I'm an athiest, but even I don't think that the Big Bang theory catagorically DISPROVES the notion that there could be a God who initiated the whole process. It's entirely possible that an intelligence did create the universe. There just hasn't been any unambiguous proof that there is a God or that God has actively intervened in our universe.

The Big Bang theory - more accuratlely the evidence used to support it - It does disprove the biblical account of how/when the universe, earth and life came into being, however.

Answer 7

Where did the STUFF for the BIG BANG come from? Oh, it was ALWAYS there? But you can't accept GOD being always there?
The operative word is THEORY. A theory cannot PROVE anything since IT hasn't been proven.

Answer 8

The most modern theory is M Theory. It includes a cause for the Big Bang an a description of what was here "before" it. It doesn't disprove a god, but it sure makes the whole idea redundant.

Answer 9

I am a Creationist who believes the Big Bang Theory may be correct. There appears to be a lot of evidence for it.

The Big Bang is HUGE evidence for a Creator. 1. This is exactly how the Bible says things began. Suddenly and fast.
2. The Big Bang requires an origin for this concentrated matter which exploded. An omnipotent Creator is the least miraculous explanation for it. ANY explanation requires a supernatural explanation since natural laws were not in place then. Any other explanation would be more miraculous than simply acknowledging a Creator.

This is why there are very few atheist Astrophysicists left!

Answer 10

"Big Bang" was an insult that backfired on the steady-state physicist who coined the term, Fred Hoyle. M-Theory is now what it is called.

And to the liar below, the discipline of physics contains the highest percentage of atheists among scientists, well over 90 percent. Probably closer to 100 percent.

Answer 11

If you take a Kabbalistic view of creation, then the Big Bang explains creation. It's the dim-wits who take the bible word for word (although ironically, they are usually reading it in English, not Hebrew, so it isn't even truly word-for-word) that have issues with the big bang.