2007-10-06 07:53:41 · 13 answers · asked by jellybean'smom 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Etiquette
I don't know about ethically wrong, but "weird" certainly comes to mind.
2007-10-07 11:38:41 · answer #1 · answered by a las barricadas 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ethically wrong. No. To personal. Yes.
2007-10-06 10:38:05 · answer #2 · answered by saraimay75 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This has nothing to do with ethics. But it does have to do with common sense. If you are planning to have intercourse with a person, then it makes sense to find out what communicable diseases they may have or have had. On the other hand, if you choose not to have sex on the first date, then you are overstepping the bounds of good manners.
2007-10-06 10:47:25 · answer #3 · answered by old lady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Dates" or somebody you are going to have intercourse with? in case you have HIV, specific you may desire to, in case you recognize you're contaminated. the aptitude ramifications? None, that i will think of of, different than saving human beings from an prolonged, painful dying. and could I upload that there is priority for this, which includes quarantining those with deadly infectious illnesses (it fairly is not a similar, yet analogous). The rights of the guy to FREEDOM is contingent on the rights of others to protection and life. Edit- As for reducing incentive to get examined, i might desire no longer. in the adventure that your intent is "yet whilst i understand that I even have HIV, i'm going to ought to end having unprotected intercourse" then needless to say your priorities are heavily screwed up. capture a sickness early so as that i will stay an prolonged, extra healthy life (the faster you start up therapy, the extra appropriate the diagnosis) or danger demise a terrible dying so as that i ought to *unknowingly* infect others over the direction of a number of years? Yeah, it fairly is annoying. base line-in case you recognize which you're HIV useful, and you work together in events which you recognize will placed others in threat, you're criminally culpable, or could desire to be. it fairly is comparable to utilising under the effect of alcohol. you're putting others in threat, by criminal negligence.
2016-10-10 10:23:49 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, not to mention incredibly rude. That's far too personal a question to ask on a first date!
2007-10-06 09:42:32 · answer #5 · answered by nolajazzyguide 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not exactly sure it's a question of ethics... but many people would certainly be put off by it.
2007-10-06 16:48:59 · answer #6 · answered by drshorty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in most cases, yes. However it is acceptable if you're being interviewed as a potential egg or sperm donor.
2007-10-06 08:00:25 · answer #7 · answered by mediahoney 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, unless you are the most picky, choosy person in the world. (Unless you are having sex I think)
2007-10-06 08:05:45 · answer #8 · answered by Sajid K 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is. get to know them better first
2007-10-06 08:41:37 · answer #9 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is wrong.
2007-10-06 08:28:27 · answer #10 · answered by Balsam 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋