yes, we are. why? well.. because when we muslims decided to stay back in india and not shift our base to pakistan, we also decided to copy our brothers in humanity, the nonmuslims living in india. whether it is blasting bombs or hurting people of other religions. HAPPY!
P.S. one suggestion:- keep your stupid and baseless questions for your personal friends, may be they are entertained, not visitors of this site, with an exception of those who share their brain credentials with you.
2007-10-06 11:31:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Islamic conquest at the time of Umar ibn al-Khattab [638 AD] put an end to centuries of instability, religious persecution, and colonial rule. After the advent of Islam, people enjoyed security, safety, and peace- with the exception of the period of the Crusades (1099-1198). There was scholarly activity on a wide scale. It was a center of learning from which a large number of scholars graduated. It enjoyed the care of the Khalifas and the Muslim rulers.
Jews returned to the City only when the Muslims took over and opened it to all believers. In other words, Jerusalem was not an exclusive city during Muslim rule. For example, the arrival of Umar in Jerusalem marked the start of a golden age and the beginning of a new era during which the City became an open city for all the nations, a city for justice and peace.
Umar was "faithful to the Islamic inclusive vision. Unlike the Jews and Christians, Muslims did not attempt to exclude others from Jerusalem's holiness" and instead of excluding these religions in Jerusalem, "Muslims were being taught to respect them.
"From the first, Muslims showed that the respect of sacred space did not have to mean conflict, enmity, killng, and exclusion of others...From the start, the Muslims developed an inclusive vision of Jerusalem which did not deny the presence and devotion of others, but respected their rights and celebtrated plurality and co-existence. This inclusive vision of holiness is sorely needed by the people of Jerusalem today." **
** Karen Armstrong "Sacred Space: the Holiness of Jerusalem,"
....
2007-10-06 08:16:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by kloneme 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Dear Brother, I am a muslim. I cannot call hindus fanatics just by taking into consideration the manner in which some SHIV-SAINIKS react to certain situations or by taking the behaviour of certain BJP avtivists or RSS activists. It is very wrong on your part to generalise like that. Every religion has its deviants . Even on a personal level you may be a deviant of your own goals you have set for yourself.But that thus not mean you are a fanatic.
As far as your comment on role of muslims in population explosion is concerned , you are totally wrong. Child is as gift of ALLAH. What would say about those hindus who kill their female child before birth. Muslims don't indulge in these inhuman and grievious sins. In fact condoms aimed to control child birth is promoting pre-marital sex. Don't tell me you are unaware about that. Muslims know that all life and death is in the hands of ALLAH THE SUPREME>
2007-10-06 08:35:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by SHAHAZAD SHAIKH 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Who is to be considered a muslim? Majority of populations in the muslim states cannot read, especially not Arabic. How could they know then what Islam is? But those who can have just two possibilities left: not to believe - and not to be fanatic, or to believe - and to be fanatic. Those who have read Koran will understand why I am putting it this way.
2007-10-06 07:47:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mirka 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
According to Government database, more Hindus have multiple wives in India than Muslims have. The same is the case with more children.
If Vajpayee and Advani do not marry, India's population will not reduce. More people are producing. Hindus multiplied from 30 crores to 70 crores. Muslms became 10 to 13 crores. Decide who produce more children.
2007-10-06 08:01:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, most of the Muslims are not fanatic, just as most of the Christians are not fanatic. Most people would just like to get on with their lives, making a living, raising their families and having a modicum of comfort. The difficulty arises when those people who are driven to acquire power use religion to persuade others to kill their fellow human beings.
2007-10-06 07:41:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
can you back up the "they are not bothered about population explosion" statement with a source? Then I will be able to tell if it is worth answering your qu. You do mean "increase in population" - with the term population explosion, correct?
thanx
2007-10-06 07:41:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by 地獄 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not mosst of them. The problem is with some, though in minority, leaders who interpret their Koran in wrong way and beget terrorism with the help of fanatic enthusiast youth and disturb peace in other faiths, especially Hindus are targetted and this is really unfortunate.
2007-10-06 18:15:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by keshav pd 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tell us how do you feel?
"They are not bothered about population explosion"
Do you feed Muslim? I'm Muslim you never feed me, did you?
Look what Al;-Qur'aan says about it...
[51:56] I did not create the jinns and the humans except to worship Me alone.
[51:57] I need no provisions from them, nor do I need them to feed Me.
[51:58] GOD is the Provider, the Possessor of all power, the Supreme.
[6:151] Say, "Come let me tell you what your Lord has really prohibited for you: You shall not set up idols besides Him. You shall honor your parents. You shall not kill your children from fear of poverty - we provide for you and for them. You shall not commit gross sins, obvious or hidden. You shall not kill - GOD has made life sacred - except in the course of justice. These are His commandments to you, that you may understand."
[17:31] You shall not kill your children due to fear of poverty. We provide for them, as well as for you. Killing them is a gross offense.
May God Guide you
2007-10-07 01:43:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Furqaan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anyone who claims that only his or her religion is the best or even better than other religions is besides being a fanatic also very stupid. There is certainly no lack of such in Islam and to a lesser extent in Christanity.
To Indian Princess-- Thanks for the 5 stars!
2007-10-06 09:20:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋