2007-10-05 22:42:45 · 8 answers · asked by brad 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
With greater trust than we can believe the unscientific and totally distorted, ignoring the facts, claims of the creationists.
2007-10-05 22:46:41 · answer #1 · answered by rdenig_male 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
How, in the light of their history of proven lies, can we trust any claims offered by the creationists? Cavemen riding dinosaurs (creationist museum, Kansas). The earth is 6,000 years old. There was a great flood and a boat held two of every animal. People lived hundreds of years, etc. etc Sorry, but the attempts by barely literate farmers to explain what they didn't understand just don't hold up under scrutiny.
2007-10-06 06:02:54 · answer #2 · answered by Michael J 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The structure of your inquiry is known as 'begging the question.' It is a basic flaw in reasoning, which unfortunately shows you don't know how to ask a question. Any person with sense--whether they believe in evolution or not--could point that out to you. It's too bad, because it demonstrates your basic ignorance, and regardless of what you believe, showing your ignorance is not going to make intelligent people respect you, even if they agree with you. Try looking up 'begging the question' in a book on logic or even an English grammar book.
2007-10-06 09:11:55 · answer #3 · answered by holacarinados 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Robert B, your poor spelling and inability to form a grammatically correct sentence negate any value your statement might have. Next time click the "Check Spelling" feature before calling someone an idiot.
2007-10-06 12:27:51 · answer #4 · answered by blakenyp 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The great thing about science is that it doesn't involve faith... it is subject to the rigors of the scientific method. Scientists have theories, and they test them, but more importantly, they ask others to test them... For a real scientist, the truth is more important than their hypothesis.
2007-10-06 06:06:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Proven lies by who?
2007-10-06 10:48:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Even bad physical evidence is more convincing than superstition. Believe what you want, just don't try and convince anyone else
2007-10-06 06:01:30 · answer #7 · answered by 1crazypj 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
There theory of stupidity, only stands to reason, they have always been nanners. Bio-nanners, Big Bio-nanners, Very Big Bad Bio-nanners. But bio-nanners all the same. Thats acording to my best recolection.
2007-10-06 05:49:50 · answer #8 · answered by The13thstone 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋