English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

24 answers

Uh... we were trying and we didn't kill Saddam... where have you been? Saddam was held on trial by his country and hanged by them. The news is always interesting.....

Chi... 300,000 Kurds don't count? Who else aren't "people" in your book?

2007-10-05 18:49:13 · answer #1 · answered by That Guy 5 · 6 1

The bin Laden family has been buddies with the senior Bush for decades. Osama worked very hard to set up the CIA al qaeda camps in Afghanistan. Together they brought in terrorists from 32 nations. Hand in hand they fought off the Russians. Now the US wants bin Laden out of Afghanistan but I promise they are not going to kill one of their pals and subcontractors. Who says Saddam is dead? Did you see the body? He's probably tucked in bed with the Saudis, enjoying a lot of wealth and wives.

2007-10-05 19:52:23 · answer #2 · answered by whrldpz 7 · 0 0

OBL went to probably the wildest region on earth to hide in caves. To get him we would have to violate the sovereignty of a couple of our allies.
Clinton had numerous chances to kill, capture or Even just let someone hand him over but lover boy didn't have time to be bothered with protecting the country he was more into smoking cigars with Monica.
Watch the election news in Pakistan this weekend and if Musharraf is returned to office it could spell DOOM for OBL.

We didn't kill Saddam he was turned over to his own country men and received a fair trial BEFORE the hanging.

2007-10-05 19:13:37 · answer #3 · answered by CFB 5 · 1 0

Or, we should have committed to eliminating Bin Laden before moving on to Saddam.

2007-10-05 18:50:24 · answer #4 · answered by Tweet 3 · 2 1

Since all the liberals claim it was Bush that caused 9/11, why do liberals want to kill Bin Laden? Maybe they're supporting two theories in case they're wrong about either one.

2007-10-05 18:51:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

We should have tried to kill Bin Laden in the '90s when he was offered to us three times.

2007-10-05 18:55:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

Bin Laden was only an excuse to invade Iraq, after the other methods to control Iraq such as the way Amerrica won "controll" of Saudi Arabia ,with Petro dollars.
Saddam wouldnt buy it, and the CIA jackals couldn't get to him so the last resort was invasion.
America has to control Iraq for its oil

2007-10-05 19:00:48 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 1 2

Absolutely, especially since the supposed reason for this war was 9/11, from what I was told Saddam turned down any involvement in the 9/11 attacks, when Osama offered him an opportunity to join his force.

2007-10-05 18:50:25 · answer #8 · answered by This girl 3 · 1 2

here is the occasion united states of america gave the international: eff with us, and faster or later you will pay. I wager Obama became in a state of absolute disbelief interior the surreal internet site he would desire to of beheld formerly he took 2, one interior the left eye and one interior the chest. After 10 years, he became probably lulled right into a feeling of fake safety in Pakistan. OBL did no longer commit a single atrocity as Lt. William Caley did interior the My Lai (What, me lie?) bloodbath in Vietnam in 1968. extremely, he dedicated distinctive crimes against Humanity, and it somewhat is been user-friendly because of the fact the AM of 11 Sept. 2001 that there is an reward for his seize of suggestions, and that he became needed "ineffective or alive." Do you think of Hitler might have survived interior the Führerbunker if he waited and surrendered to the Russians? The orders have been to convey him returned to Moscow ineffective or alive. would a million, 1945 his continues to be have been dug up and shipped to Moscow for forensics artwork. Lingering doubts by way of Stalin led to distinctive exhumations of the bones. the sole section i do no longer think is that OBL became "buried at sea." The have his physique on ice to maintain self-indulgent revisionism at bay, a minimum of for a pair of days.

2016-12-14 08:52:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think the Bush administration looked upon bin Laden as the police do terminally ill vagrants and petty criminals.

They could arrest them, but then they'd have to treat them.

(A taste of reality in America.)

Why spend millions chasing down an old man whose receiving dialysis in a cave?

2007-10-05 18:55:41 · answer #10 · answered by wider scope 7 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers