It seriously cracks me up the way libs believe that there were not radical Muslims before we invaded Iraq.
I take it nobody here remember Iran taking US hostages at the beginning of their Islamic Revolution.
2007-10-05 18:59:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dina W 6
·
5⤊
6⤋
No country or combinations of countries in the Middle east can decimate Israel. The Clerics of Iran run the country not Nejad. He is just a load mouthed hate monger. WWlll I do not believe anymore will start in the Middle east. It will begin when some little nothing country does something stupid in its part of the world.
Wars are fought for ideals, religion, food, territory, power, greed, and poverty. There has never been a good war. Most are fought for power and the people be damned. The losers in wars are the people who fight them and the people where the wars are fought.
Liberals, conservatives, Neo-Nazi's, Religious Fanatics and the rest will blame who ever is convenient. There is no right answer for why a war. There is no wrong answer either.
2007-10-05 19:02:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Like each and every thing politicians do, little question for appearances sake. it does not have been a bad visual charm for all people. it would have had a favorable result on the attitudes of folk in center east in direction of the U. S.. it could have been a relatively diplomatic component to do, expressing sympathy for the U. S.' loss, with out inciting resentment interior maximum of the human beings of muslims. there have been multiple requests from a number of persons, over the previous couple of years, for muslims ordinarily to denounce themselves, or say they're actual sorry, or some thing, as though they have been all responsible as a team, or obliged to care approximately our issues. In gentle of that i might say it makes individuals seem extraordinarily small minded, turning Ahmadinejad down on his grant to make this type of danger unfastened and appropriate gesture.
2016-10-10 09:46:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by megna 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course the liberals will blame Bush. The funny thing is that Bush won't even be in office when Iran attacks Isreal, but it will still be his fault.
2007-10-05 21:00:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rocman 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Iran does not have the capability and is not stupid enough to try.
And, Israel learned its lesson about Bush after adopting his ‘military’ approach to fighting terrorism and got burned in Lebanon last year. Afterward, while visiting America, Israel’s Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said that Israel would never make that mistake again and was returning to using the ‘police’ strategy and tactics that have proven successful – not just in Israel, but when was the last time you heard anything about the IRA or Red Brigade?
You don’t hear about them because they were dealt with as ‘crimes’ and not ‘wars’.
The damage that Bush has unleashed is incalculable. Ultimately, he may bear responsibility for the deaths of millions of Americans. Recent reports by the US Department of State and a consensus of America’s 16 Intelligence Agencies both concluded that Bush Administration policy is making the terror situation worse and that America was less secure than prior to 9/11.
2007-10-05 19:09:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Yes, they will be saying Bush should have invited him over to the White House to talk and share a needle of morphine when he had the chance.
And, perhaps, he should have rigged something up and done just that. lol
2007-10-05 19:23:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by wider scope 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes that will be his fault as is global warming, the inefficiency of Congress, the price of oil, the illegal killing of whales in Alaska, the inadequacy of stocked salmon in the Pacific Northwest, the international community's almost total disregard for the travesties in Africa, Dale Jr changing to 88 and the new taste of 7 UP.
2007-10-05 18:53:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Gen Tso Meets Gen Tang 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
West Hollywood.
And the Israelis, despite Olmert's ineptitude, will never allow A-jad to develop the necessary technology to threaten their country.
However, for this, the libs will indeed blame Bush and the con/fascist/Zionists.
2007-10-05 19:02:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kubla Con 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Oh, come on, you know Israel is the war monger in the middle east, I would love for you to name 1 time that Iran has attacked a country since it has become Iran, and then for the fun of it list how many time Israel has attacked other countries in just the past year. I think we hitched our wagon to a pit bull instead of a dove
2007-10-05 18:59:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Michael G 4
·
7⤊
4⤋
The libs blame Bush for everything else.... why not?
Good Hell Truth... do a little homework would you? Schip program is in place and has not gone anywhere... for your info, that is the social program that insures the children who are in the lower class. The libs wanted to increase the age to 25 and the availability to households making up to $83,000.00 a year. Does that sound right to you? Someone making $80,000.00 a year should qualify for free health care for their ADULT children? LEARN ABOUT IT BEFORE SPEWING ABOUT IT!!!! The real idea behind it was for libs to introduce Universal Health Care slowly and behind the backs of the American people.... this is how they get most things done. Bush DID NOT take away the already in place program. Education is a good thing!
2007-10-05 18:51:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by That Guy 5
·
3⤊
6⤋
Truth did answer your question but you're too dense to understand.
Decimation of a nuclear country means nuclear weapons were used, as decimation means a ten percent kill rate, which means you think the US would not respond before that happened. Truth is saying you're too stupid to post a real question, so he posted one that is closer to reality, dummy.
GROW up and grow a pair, junior. Hollywood is for adults, not children. Maybe you should stay in your sandbox, muffin.
2007-10-05 18:59:12
·
answer #11
·
answered by NightShade 3
·
4⤊
4⤋