Is that such a terrible idea? Ponder it while you driving around tomorrow in your petroleum burning vehicle. The world runs on petroleum. It's the single most strategic resource on the planet.
2007-10-05 17:40:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chad 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Israel has sufficient issues handling this is enemies to purpose to characteristic gas to the Arab fire. Israel could make no distinction to the dislike crammed Arab worldwide,the place minorities are dealt with with a entire loss of compassion.Even ordinary human interactions and events may bring about mob violence and mayhem which you do not come upon in London or Brussels or Tel Aviv. A working example is the soccer violence in Port stated in Egypt the place close on a hundred people have been killed and one thousand injured.They attributed this to the Police,ex -dictator Mubarek and that i does not be shocked if Israel grew to become into blamed.The reason grew to become into the history of the two golf equipment and their animosities. Syria is blaming remote places intervention for what's clearly a reaction to a tyranical dictatorship led by skill of a hereditory oligarchy belonging to a Shi'ite minority. The Kurds have at long final been given semi -self sustaining structures in Iraq.The Copts,10% of Egypt are quetly rapid emigrating from Egypt with this is overwhelming new Muslim parliament. Hizbolla,subsidized by skill of this is Iranian masters is in digital administration of Lebanon. Israel is acquainted with that if it supported any downtrodden minority in the Arab worldwide it stands out as the kiss of loss of life for that team,and actually does not help Israel.
2016-10-21 04:59:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
TRUE. !! Ongoing Construction of an "Embassy" Half the Size as DELAWARE. !! Your U.S. Tax $$ at Work. 6-7-8 PERMANENT Air Force BASES in Iraq ?? Plus 6-7 PERMANENT Air Bases in Afghan. ?? This ILLEGAL Invasion and OCCUPATION, Might be Making China, Russia, India, Pakistan a Bit Nervous. ?? Wouldn't be Suprised if These Countries haven't Considered "First Strike" because of the BushNaziFascist-Regime CONTROLLING these Two Oil Rich Country's. and Yes, 9/11 WAS an INSIDE JOB. !!! http://www.matrixmasters.com/blog/bushcrime/bushcrime01.html
2007-10-05 17:54:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well, it isn't much of a oil cash cow in the present. So that part's wrong.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_level_imports/current/import.html
We have a military bases in Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Oman.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0702/p07s02-wosc.html
But they can't be sure that Iraq will allow a permanent base there.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2004/040930-iraq-bases.htm
2007-10-05 18:45:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obviously, there are many benefits to a stable Iraq, and many negatives to leaving Iraq a mess. If this weren't true, we wouldn't still be there. Take some medication and go to bed now.
2007-10-05 17:45:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by JamesWilliamson 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
number 2 is correct.
and yes we do have oil interest. But security Interest is primary. We can not leave with out creating a terorist state and leaving 10000's of people to die.
Funny how the left rund to help polar bears and runs away instead of helping people
2007-10-05 17:44:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yes that is the objective, what's wrong with a having an ally in the middle east?
2007-10-05 17:41:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by - 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Forgot about your obsession with oil for just a moment (if possible). Think about the Hitler of Iran. Think about Syria. Think about Lebanon. Think about the survival of Israel. Get your mind off of oil for just a minute and think about the regional implications. The Hitler of Iran is ready to wipe Israel off the map.
2007-10-05 18:42:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by reaganite27 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
False. Bush indends to do that. Americans do not. And--whether the Bush regime likes it or not, in the long run the American people are the ones who make the final decisions in this country--not "the Decider."
2007-10-05 17:41:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
I guess you'd rather Iraqis be under Saddam's brutal control. You don't care about people. You just hate the USA.
2007-10-05 17:42:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by pgb 4
·
2⤊
2⤋