Well, since the UN and Congress voted to oust saddam...it seems your Loch Ness analogy is nonsense.
2007-10-07 06:06:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Iraqi war would be the theme of a sit com if it wasn't so tragic. Almost an entire nation suddenly waving flags and dumping on the 'french' because George Bush got up and lied his @ss off and hardly a soul noticed that the king had no clothes. Anyone who who saw the connection between Iraq, oil, Cheney's secret meetings with the godfathers of the Oil Mafia and the war and mentioned it in public was swift-boated, jeered at, called a Saddam lover, un-American, a surrender monkey and a 'liberal'. Yet, the real reason is and always has been the oil of the middle east and all the other reasons stated by the Bush Junta were and are total BS. The Loch Ness Monster is far more real than the reasons given for our forever occupation of Iraq. The only light at the end of this tunnel is that someday the truth will out and maybe Bush, Cheney and the rest of that posse of losers will be brought up on charges....let us pray!
2007-10-05 17:39:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Noah H 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Loch Ness Monster
2007-10-05 17:23:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Neither. I think your ulterior motive will be discovered before the LochNess monster or your alleged Bush motive for Iraq.
2007-10-05 17:26:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by vegaswoman 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
If Elvis is still alive.
We'll never know the truth about Bush or the Clinton's.
2007-10-05 17:23:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Adelaide B 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
... actually Saddam stored the WMD in Nessie's stomach, who's a secret agent for Lybia who's spying on Brittan in the Loch...
so when they find Nessie... we will also find the WMD...
same time...
EDIT: for those of you wondering what "Bush bashers" will do after Bush's term is up...
may I please direct your attention to the Clinton bashers from 7+ years ago...
note that now they STILL blame everything on Clinton and still think people care about their Clinton conspiracy theories...
so, I would venture to say that the Bush bashers will follow the Clinton bashers in the "political bashing mold" if you will... of still blaming everything on the "bashee"
2007-10-05 17:24:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I wonder what everyone is going to do with their free time in 15 months when this administration is gone. So many people's, especially young people's, politically ideology is anti-Bush and Iraq centric that they're not going to know what to say or do.
2007-10-05 17:20:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chad 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
Big Foot, or El Chupacapra.
Were more likely to see aliens land on the White House lawn before Bush admits the war was for oil.
2007-10-05 17:19:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
for you, this is a one sided question...liberals will never understand the real threat of al qaeda so for YOU, your answer is the monster....
clinton ignored it for eight years.
harry reid thinks the best way to face the enemy is unilateral surrender
and nancy pelosi wants to stunt in syria
i rest my case.
2007-10-05 17:33:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The first has already been discovered. Saddam was a terrorist.
http://www.truewordtoday.blogspot.com
2007-10-05 17:19:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋