2007-10-05 16:48:22 · 14 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I kind of like Rudy's kaboom, kabaam style myself.
We need someone who the world will know IS serious.
Weakness is a thing of he nineties and it didn't work.
2007-10-05 16:56:53 · answer #1 · answered by wider scope 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyone who doesn't believe in nation building after a war.
Someone who will go in, bomb the heck out of them, and say, "You attempted the assassination of our President, tried to attack a neighboring kingdom, paid suicide bombers to kill civilians in another ally of ours, and you claim you want us destroyed and are actively seeking ways to do it.
You've committed several acts of war. We are bombing you into the Stone Age. Abandon your country now. We are destroying the capital. If you fight us, we will destroy the next biggest city. We will continue until you stop fighting us with an unconditional surrender. We will then come in, strip your country of weapons with your full cooperation WITHOUT reservation, or we will leave and continue bombing. NO exceptions.
Then we will leave. We will not pay you money, we will not build you buildings, we will not help the children or the poor. If you wish to avoid this in the future, DON'T let another dictator like that take power. Fight him yourself before he becomes a threat to others.
We are not the unflagging allies of anyone. We even chased Israel, which supposedly "controls us" out of the region near the Suez Canal during THAT crisis.
Why would we show you mercy for attacking us?"
Then the candidate should follow through.
No more nation building. Enough of it.
Bomb the cities that support terrorism and leave them the way they are.
After a month, every city in the Islamic world would actively kill all terrorists and jihadists upon being identified.
That is the candidate I would vote for.
Because that is the candidate most likely to get Islam to clean house, and thus to help Islam survive and enter the free world with free speech, freedom of religion, and equality as basic ethics of their culture.
Dictatorships and religious governments can't afford such freedoms.
2007-10-05 17:02:46 · answer #2 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't be an issue if our military wouldn't have been raped and nearly destroyed by base closings during the first Bush and Clinton regimes. No excuse to ever cut military funding or close a base. Just like there is no excuse for any child in this country to be hungry or uninsured. This is America if we can't take care of our own why are we feeding the rest of the world.
2007-10-05 16:55:05 · answer #3 · answered by archkarat 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There is only one way of effective diplomacy, and thats from a position of power. So of the democrats. Believe it or not, Billary. I dislike her, but she isn't a fool. From the republicans. Fred Thompson.
2007-10-05 16:53:01 · answer #4 · answered by redlegman64 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
diplomacy wont avid another Iraq. The only thing that will, is to drop bombs ans kills thousands of innocent people like Bill Clinton did
2007-10-05 16:52:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I wish Micheal Reagan were running... We could use some Reagan diplomacy about now.
2007-10-05 16:54:01 · answer #6 · answered by gcbtrading 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Ron Paul
2007-10-05 16:51:58 · answer #7 · answered by amalone 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Our President Bush!!!
2007-10-05 16:55:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bill Clinton in the form of Hilary.
2007-10-05 16:51:39 · answer #9 · answered by eric l 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
None. However, I do believe that Obama would be the biggest sucker. Every time he opens his mouth, I realize he's an idiot.
2007-10-05 16:50:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋