of course it will, its what the usa does these days. lets not kid ourselves, no WMD's found, Bin Laden's business partners with Bush, Chavez has the balls to tell it like it is and thats gotta hurt.
It seems that americans are the only ones left believing the american propaganda machine these days...but thats just how your government wants it.
2007-10-05 19:11:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by wotzthepoint? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
That depends on what you mean by "invade". If you mean a half-assed invasion, infinitely more half-assed than our invasion of Iraq, then yes, it's possible. Or if we had a draft (good luck getting that through) we might actually have the forces required.
More probable would be air-strikes and perhaps a minimal invasion force (if any). I don't think it's a really good idea at this point, though.
Israel is capable of doing the job if you're talking about Iran, and I'm not sure what other country you could be referencing. Israel has done this exact same thing to stop their neighbors from developing nukes in the past, and they did it almost flawlessly. Let them deal with it, because they're who the nukes will be aimed at anyway.
2007-10-05 22:45:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran may be an issue that needs to be dealt with soon, but I believe the Israelis can take care of them alone. We just need to show support to keep Syria out of it.
Our two major problems beyond that?
1. Osama bin Laden and the Taliban. Remember them? They're coming back to an Afghanistan near you.
2. Hugo Chavez and Venezuela. This man is wanting to attack us. He hates us. He's closer than Iran is. He could reach... and he's buddies with Iran. Can you say nuclear nutcase?
Hopefully we can deal with Chavez economically. Afghanistan is going to be a war but we do need to finish off Al Qaeda once and for all.
2007-10-05 22:38:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bryan~ Unapologetic Conservative 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, the republicans are desperately looking for an excuse to invade Iran, and they know the next president will be responsible to not randomly invade countries, so I think Bush, having nothing to lose, will accidentally have troops wander into Iran and then have to invade if the retaliate. Thats why the are telling stories that Iraq is the providers of IUD's now
2007-10-05 22:41:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Michael G 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
You need to go back and look at the 17 UN resolutions regarding Iraq. You'll find that we had ample "permission" to go after Iraq. First, he violated the cease fire agreement the UN brokered at the end of the first gulf war in '91. That alone is authority enough to "invade".
2007-10-05 23:10:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by madd texan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
the US has never "invaded" a country.
The US took out a dictator only after he was non-compliant with United Nation resolutions...for the 14th time.
This should have been done earlier. I would hope we would be proactive in future situations like this
2007-10-05 22:40:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by ewert56 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Only If another dumb A $ $ country would dare try and mess with the U.S. of A!
2007-10-05 22:37:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Don Vittorio Corlleone 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Do you think fundametalist jihadis from another country will commit another terrorist attack against US citizens here in America soon?
2007-10-05 22:41:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes.......... they just cant wait to go into Iran and Syria .
2007-10-05 22:38:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, we don't attack unless we get hit first.
2007-10-05 22:36:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
0⤊
0⤋