English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

At ages 14 to 17 years old young female womens started to have unprotectived sex with their partners soon of a later there belly grows big and try to hire an abortionist to clear their problems by killing the babies while inside the womb.

Do you agree that young girls should'nt have an unprotectived sex at ages 14 to 17 years old girls like that are sometimes get tempted by their partners to have sex.

I did a speech on this on my high school auditorioum and show some disturbing and educational footages about abortionist and how babies are born.

2007-10-05 15:20:05 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Women's Health

9 answers

i am totally FOR abortion.



100%

2007-10-05 15:24:35 · answer #1 · answered by Nicole 5 · 2 0

Kids 14 to 17 shouldn't be having sex PERIOD.
The trouble is the parents do not teach them and so they experiment not realizing what sex could lead to. Kids are getting younger when they experiment as well.
Another thing is they don't have access to birth control. That doesn't help things either.

When I was 14 through 17, very few girls had sex. This was in the 70s.

If we can wait till adulthood, so can the kids of today.

Kids not having sex = not getting pregnant = no abortion of fetus (it's not a baby yet).

Back in the old days - before abortion was legal - they used to send girls away to have the babies and give the babies up for adoption.

I'm not saying I'm against abortion. For some things (rape, incest, pregnant kids under 14), it is a must. Using abortion as birth control should be controlled - people need to use some control -either don't have sex or use birth control or get permanently sterilized. There are also miscarriages (spontaneous abortions by God), so you can't say God is against abortion because HE makes it happen as well.
Yes, abortion is ugly, but there are other things far worse.

2007-10-05 23:15:03 · answer #2 · answered by Tara662 7 · 0 0

I think its more of an issue of balance and accountability.

My question is, if a child at 14 years old is out having sex, where the hell are his/her parents??

Parents need to step up and raise their children right.. I'm going to sound like an old fart (I'm only 30 though) but 50 years ago, kids were not out screwing around at 14 years old.

Just today, I had a patient come into my office, at 14 years old, she's been sexually active for 6 months, smokes a pack a day, drinks alcohol and smokes pot occasionally.. her mother was right there beside her saying nothing as her daughter told us this history.... I see a HUGE problem with that.

I agree with abortion to control a mistake... There are too many children suffering in this world, and we don't need anymore to suffer and feel unwanted. (Adoption, sure.. but lets get all the kids out of orphanages 1st)

I would far rather see a child like this abort than go on and try to raise a child when she wasn't even raised properly herself.

2007-10-05 22:34:11 · answer #3 · answered by Mom2Boyzz 3 · 2 0

Do you believe that having a baby is punishment for having sex?

You're right, young girls should not have unprotected sex. You're right that their partners try very hard to get them to have sex. Where you're wrong is your assumption that the correct answer is to force them to have children when they're still children themselves. This does not make everything better, it makes it worse.

We should concentrate on getting these girls to use birth control, because they're not going to abstain.

Oh, and just an observation, but the guys who were against abortion always looked like the ugly guys who weren't getting laid anyway.

2007-10-05 22:37:07 · answer #4 · answered by Katherine W 7 · 0 0

If their bellies are growing big they are past the stage of legal abortion. Yes, I think that teenagers should refrain from having unprotected sex. That doesn't mean I believe they should be forced to have children as punishment. A baby is a blessing, not a consequence.

2007-10-05 22:23:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It depends on the dilema. Do you believe that a 14-17 year old teenager should bare the child of their Molestor?

Do you believe that a 14-17 year old child should be forced to bare a child if she and her child are at risk to die?

Like I said, "It depends on the Dilema.".

Many teens have circumstances; as we adults do, too.
I just don't believe that a child should be forced to die for making a dumb decision at 14-17 years of age.

2007-10-05 23:18:43 · answer #6 · answered by Greenie 4 · 1 0

Well they should not b having sex at 14 at all. I so agree with u. The only reason y there should b an abortion is RAPE.
My child would b having that baby.

2007-10-05 22:27:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I believe abortion is wrong all the way around. And I also don't believe in having sex before marriage.

2007-10-05 22:24:38 · answer #8 · answered by Katara 3 · 1 0

Yes abortion is WRONG. no matter what

2007-10-05 22:29:31 · answer #9 · answered by lemo_07 2 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers