I can't make up my mind.
2007-10-05 14:17:43 · 10 answers · asked by Enigma 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No
The fire arms charges they had on him could easily be handle when he went into town like he did daily.
There was no need for an ATF raid on the compound because that is what he wanted.
The results were women and children burn to death by the orders of Janet Reno.
2007-10-05 14:24:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No. He did break the law. However, they had plenty of opportunity to grab him outside of the compound.
If he was molesting children then he was a threat to them but they were in his congregation due to their parents who should have been arrested as well for child endangerment or something.
2007-10-05 21:21:39 · answer #2 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He was a threat to the woman and children in his compound.
2007-10-05 21:33:39 · answer #3 · answered by Sweet Tea & Lemons 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he was breaking gun laws...
and I don't know about how big of a threat he was... but you can't just ignore people blatantly breaking the law
and if he ever did hurt anyone... EVERYONE would line up to blame the government for not doing anything...
and crazy man with guns... it's not that big of a stretch
2007-10-05 21:28:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not a threat to anyone.
Watch WACO: Rules of Engagement
2007-10-05 21:25:29 · answer #5 · answered by AveGirl 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Being a threat to his followers alone was reason enough to stop him. Who knows how far it would have gone.
2007-10-05 21:24:39 · answer #6 · answered by JohnFromNC 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i vote for clinton both times but what happen there was just wrong
2007-10-05 21:30:51 · answer #7 · answered by paulcondo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The government thugs thought he was.
2007-10-05 21:23:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
WELL JANET RENO AND BILL CLINTON SAID HE WAS.
2007-10-05 22:27:49 · answer #9 · answered by jerry z 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he was.
2007-10-05 23:23:43 · answer #10 · answered by BOOM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋