http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucwb/20071005/cm_ucwb/thewarinthevernacular;_ylt=AguZX1WTGEK7gyD8cphFU9r9wxIF
I see a lot of neocons being upset with Buckley's conclusion.
2007-10-05 12:08:54 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Lavrenti Beria: The only reason why I am considered a liberal by you, is that I don't agree with your socialist neocon ideology.
2007-10-05 12:14:34 · update #1
David R: I agree. Buckley is great at evicerating people with his vocabulary and wit. For most people, his columns go right over their heads.
2007-10-05 12:27:05 · update #2
gregory: Read the link. Do some research on whom Bill Buckley is, before spontaneously reacting.
2007-10-05 12:28:18 · update #3
A good article. There are no journalists like this anymore.
2007-10-05 12:23:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rush didn't say phony soldiers. He said phony soldier which was a reference to a person that never served in Iraq claiming he had served into Iraq.
Complaining without solutions is not tolerated in the military. for instance a person isn't suppose to complain about the rain, but instead ask for rain gear.
2007-10-05 19:25:37 · answer #2 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Buckley was incorrect, Rush was refering to a Man that was passing himself off as an iraqi war veteran when he had never been in uniform.
2007-10-05 19:24:07 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am OK with this. However Buckley is pretentious at times.
I only hope this further discredits Herr Limbuagh, fascist wind bag that he is.
2007-10-05 19:33:38 · answer #4 · answered by planksheer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't let your lib-pals find out that you read Buckley, they'll tar & feather you.
2007-10-05 19:13:07 · answer #5 · answered by Lavrenti Beria 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋