When the Taliban captured him and offered him for trial ?
2007-10-05 11:28:51 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
$$$$$$ & power.
2007-10-05 11:32:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
Bush needs a "demonic figure" to make his scare tactics credible. Osama fills that role very well. But if he were actually killed or captured, he'd no longer be of any use to the Bush regime--a boogeyman is only scary if he's "out there" as a looming threat.
2007-10-05 18:40:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
when did this happen? Osama and the Taliban were friends. you have it wrong, the Sudanese offered Osama to Clinton and he turned the offer down.
2007-10-05 21:08:58 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Because it's better for business to leave him at large. There are billion$ to be made in the defense/homeland security industries---the safety and security of "We, the people" be damned.
2007-10-08 14:13:35 · answer #4 · answered by S D Modiano 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
that was clinton that let him go. the sudanese offered him and clinton said we had no legal authority to hold him. now as to why we havn't found him in afghanistan, this picture could explain:
http://ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/room2awards/photos/view/4749?b=10
and that's just a tiny portion of afghanistan
2007-10-05 18:36:29 · answer #5 · answered by White 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
You have a very short and convenient mind: it was Bill Clinton, not Bush, who let Osama go, you like it or not...
2007-10-05 19:31:05 · answer #6 · answered by Millie 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Would you put a family friends son on trial and execute him if his family helps you rake in millions every year? And I see the uneducated delusional cons are still blaming Clinton for everything. Morons.
Why did Think 1st get thumbs down? What he said is true.
2007-10-05 18:36:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
you must be thinking about Sudan. The Taliban and Al Qaeda were on the same side.
2007-10-05 18:33:53 · answer #8 · answered by MrPotatoHead 4 · 5⤊ 4⤋
If you remember the press of the time, we didn't have enough to proof to arrest him at the time.
By Islamic standards, they were ready to turn him over the WEST!
We follow a stricter code of justice.
President Clinton was in the same situation when he took the Presidency. Why the political bigotry?
Our Presidents do the best they can with what we give them. This kind of nonsense post is just poorly thought-out.
2007-10-05 18:50:54 · answer #9 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 2⤊ 7⤋
The Bush and Bin Laden families are bestest buddies.
2007-10-05 18:34:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋
The Bush, Saud, and Bin Laden families have been friends and business partners for decades. It was Bin Laden money that bailed Dubya out of at least one of his many failed business ventures.
2007-10-05 18:32:59 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋