Sooner or later sombody is going to press the Nuke button, who ?

Question

Due to proliferation of nuclear arms, it is more like "when" now rather than "if" in respect to happening of nuclear war. The question is who is going to press the button first ?

Avegirl, you are right on. However, first trigger always matters. In a movie, a soldier is asked by his fiancee that did he hesitated before firing and killing a guy in battle field whom he did not know nor will never come to know. The soldier accepted that he hesitated first time. The girl asked "after that". Soldier responded with stony eyes "after that it does not make any difference".

Answer 1

Like all wars, it will be the one that you least expect. I really doubt that we need worry about a terrorist group, this is beyond their means, to design and build a nuke with the ability to hit us.
The greatest possible way to avoid this is to help out and not hand out. Countries like s. Korea become dependent on other countries because of government aid(WELFARE).
And haven't you noticed that they show force in nukes until everyone gives something.
I am sure that the next poor country is right around the corner and ready to make their presence known.

Answer 2

you're an fool. in case you new anyting approximately islam you would know nuclear holocaust would not get you 72 virgin and that even Ahmedinejad would not have faith that. turn of fox information or ccnbulshit. besides he's no longer in all probability a muslim. he's a shiite heretic. Watch this. he would not prefer to end the international. He needs international peace! He says he needs the mahdi to return returned because of the fact he needs justice and concord and treating others as equals.

Answer 3

I do not think a country will be the ones to do it. It wiill be a terrorist organization if any are to do it. I think many countries pursue nuclear weapons because of the negotiation power it brings to the table. Plus what leader really would want to bring the end to the world? I think the days of nuclear weapons are over because we realize how much damage it can bring.

Answer 4

No matter what is the questions or the answers and no matter what we think we are or what we thinks about who we are ,meaning either prisoner or the warden , rich or poor, you eat meat or beans you love or you hate you except or reject ,leftist or rightist , black or white ,religious or atheist, and all other species living with us on planet earth and beyond which we all share a common bond that's we are really one ,but there is a down side to our existence a hidden secret which kept from us and they continue to suppress the truth and to protect their system of deception from crumbling , and humanity will be free ,but are you really wants to know ,are you ready , I hope so ,and I hope SO called man in authority read it and TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE GAME IS AGAINST ALL OF US , HERE COMES THE TRUTH MY FRIENDS THAT WE ALL LIVING ON THIS PLANET AS A GUINEA PIGS , LIKE REALLY ANIMAL FARM FOR EXPERIMENTS. PURE AND SIMPLE LABORATORY

Answer 5

No one is going to set off a nuke. Look up the phrase "mutually assured destruction." Nuclear bombs require highly educated people to maintain / use. A lowlevel terrorist is not a nuclear scientist by any means.

Answer 6

Well whoever it is is likely suicidal since there will probably be retaliation, which is why we haven't had nuclear exchanges to date. Terrorists, who often commit suicide during attacks are most likely and it's also hard to retaliate against them because they do not come from a specific country.

Answer 7

Switzerland.

Answer 8

It better not be that itchy trigger fingered cowboy. The threat of mutual destruction makes use of nukes impractical.

Answer 9

I hope this never happens, but if it does I should hope it would be a terrorist ... and not a culture that knows better

Answer 10

US would launch first just like they did in WW2 and annihilated the Japanese and there entire culture .