English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I do have anaswers but im wondering if I left somethings out or if im correct with my answers. My answer includes that most U.S. leaders coveted the Spanish colonies as targets for the nations own expansion and held little regard for the abilities of the Latin American patriots. I have more but im keepthing this brief.

2007-10-05 10:36:13 · 2 answers · asked by mistista07 6 in Education & Reference Homework Help

2 answers

Nonintervention or Non-interventionism is a foreign policy which holds that political rulers should avoid alliances with other nations and avoid all wars not related to direct territorial self-defense. A similar phrase is "strategic independence"
In the United States, this foreign policy has been advocated at various times in the country's history, notably during the first century of US history. George Washington, the first US President, advised the country to avoid "foreign entanglements". Thomas Jefferson favored "peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none." John Quincy Adams wrote that the US "goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy."

The Monroe Doctrine is a U.S. doctrine which, on December 2, 1823, proclaimed that European powers would no longer colonize or interfere with the affairs of the newly independent nations of the Americas. The United States planned to stay neutral in wars between European powers and their colonies.

2007-10-09 09:13:16 · answer #1 · answered by William R 7 · 0 0

additionally, the procedures of the battling of the British did no longer mesh nicely contained in the hilly, mountainous terrain of the yank colonies. The people, having been battling with the Indians for years, took on their procedures of hiding at the back of timber and making use of the terrain as conceal. The British in basic terms ought to no longer get previous their "forming traces" and envisioned the people to do the comparable ingredient. they did no longer. additionally definite, as a prior answerer reported, they did assume the Loyalists residing contained in the Colonies to connect the warfare alongside the warriors, which failed to ensue. The British troops weren't battling a armed forces, they have been battling against backwoods militias which have been extra wild than something the British troops had seen.

2017-01-03 04:44:04 · answer #2 · answered by terrero 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers