is it a bad decision or a good one since how south africa won the first test and also new prospects like Steyn are coming in.
I mean they just dropped the best all rounder in the world right now
2007-10-05 09:56:27 · 8 answers · asked by Muralater!!!! 4 in Sports ➔ Cricket
Well dropping someone as great as Polly is kind of a wierd decision. Granted, the T20 WC didn't go well but he's a great test bowler. Why drop someone who's been so consistent for bowlers who haven't proved themselves completely. True, RSA did win, but Polly is a gem. You don't drop him unless he's injured.
2007-10-07 10:59:02 · answer #1 · answered by Cricket hues 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Though South Africa won the first test match, I strongly feel that dropping Pollock is not a wise decision as he is a utility player.
2007-10-06 03:02:11 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bad decision for short term, but this will definitely help SA later. By the time SA play the top three test playing teams, Steyn and others should be ready.
2007-10-05 16:10:30 · answer #3 · answered by Siddhartha Basu 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Like every great player a time comes when age begins to catch up a bit and they are not the force they once were.
Also you need to look to the future and encourage the new young talent
Its a shame when someone so talented and dedicated who is also a nice bloke has to lose out , but that is life I am afraid
2007-10-05 20:34:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ha Ha Ha, I thought this was going to be a medical question. Turns out I misread the question.
2007-10-05 10:12:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
its good because it wont be fair if pollock plays and akhtar does not play.
2007-10-05 10:08:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
complex stuff. look into in search engines like google. it might help!
2015-04-27 17:13:36 · answer #7 · answered by Jessica 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it worked
2007-10-05 18:12:25 · answer #8 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋