Mine are first the Iraq war, he lied the UK into this disaster.
Second bringing nearly 3 million people into the already overcrowded UK
Third promoting primitive faith schools euphemistically called "academies".
2007-10-05 09:01:28 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/10/nfaith110.xml
2007-10-05 09:08:43 · update #1
Tony Blairs crimes against this country was becomming Prime Minister
2007-10-05 09:06:03 · answer #1 · answered by Fr3dinbed 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Come on, it grew to become into US intelligence that each and every person believed. do not positioned the blame entirely on Tony Blair. Plus Saddam incredibly grew to become right into a bad chief, he defied UN resolutions many many situations, he tortured and killed his very own people and examined chemical weapons on them. I agree the justifications given weren't the main suitable ones for invading Iraq, yet Saddam did would desire to be disposed. Legally, Tony Blair isn't a conflict criminal. A conflict crimes tribunal does not seem on the justifications for going to conflict, it appears that evidently on the habit those in contact in it.
2016-10-21 03:52:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not being a Labour politician. Going in to Iraq, opening our borders, embracing the human rights act, licking the a**e of Brussels, selling us off piece by piece, having GB as chancellor, having JP as anything more than his gardener, lying through his teeth, having more spin than a fast bowler, marrying Cherie, being born, need I go on? Eh what was the question?
2007-10-05 09:34:54 · answer #3 · answered by Willow 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Breathing
2007-10-05 10:37:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Failing to introduce the Hunting Ban sooner or more effectively.
Allowing a country were uneducated idiots can pontificate on political matters when the don't have the first idea about what they are talking about.
2007-10-06 04:25:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Claiming to be Labour
How can someone on the wages he and his wife were earning a solicitors or barristers understand the needs of the people the Labour party was traditionally intended to represent
2007-10-05 09:51:21 · answer #6 · answered by Roger 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Being the poodle of Bush and taking us in to a war the British people were totally against. He should be tried as a war criminal along with Bush.
2007-10-05 09:38:46 · answer #7 · answered by flint 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Blair was a liar)) and a deceiver from the very start. i think he should go down in history as being the most perverse filthy murdering traitor that Britain ever had in power. he left the government like a rat scuttling off a sinking ship. then walked straight into a highly paid job. and handing that lying murdering swine that job, was the biggest insult you could ever have handed to the Palestinians. it just goes to prove that there realy is! one law for them, and one law for us.
2007-10-05 09:27:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
All of what you speak is really as a result of his most profound far reaching crime and that was to abandon the liberal ideology and the labour roots of eqalitarianism ,anti-elitistism ,and the championing/protecting of the ordinary citizen against the awesome powers of the state.
2007-10-05 09:20:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Playing fast and loose with our traditions and liberties and taking the public for granted - although he was re-elected twice so maybe a lot of people just don't give a **** - after all, we're all money-grubbing bastards now aren't we?
2007-10-05 12:35:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋