English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

or are they still open for debate.? Like what really happened to AA 77? And was flight 93 really intercepted?

http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=182576&fr=yfp-t-501

2007-10-05 08:59:36 · 12 answers · asked by ~☆ Petit ♥ Chou ☆~ 7 in News & Events Other - News & Events

paul, the link I have supplied has many similar clips on it, careful tho' ...you may lose an hour or so as you get engrossed in the revelations.

2007-10-05 09:05:03 · update #1

lunatic..it's the cr@p that hasn't been found that's under discussion...and as far as I'm aware...no one has made ANY statements. notice the word "theories"??? duh.

Where is video footage of flight 77..? everyone was on the alert for it, and where is the wreckage of the Pittsburgh aircraft...yeh strewn over four miles !!! so was it intercepted or not .... Open arguement NOT statement, what's up... too many unecessary "coincidences" for you to get your head round? Guess it's easier to say yes it happened like that . . end of.

2007-10-05 09:43:49 · update #2

That's more like it...corraborative evidence... Btw we are talking theories...no-one ever said anything about believing them. Hopefully the answers to this question will help sceptics realise that inncoent lives WERE lost .. and that the atrocities DID actually happen as the world sat and watched 6 years ago.

2007-10-05 09:55:57 · update #3

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa_flts/aa_flts.htm

THIS is a statement . . could be as fabricated . . . but then, so could the photo's on the Pentagon lawn. The engines pictured there, were NOT from a 757.

2007-10-05 10:00:55 · update #4

12 answers

The conspiracy theories have been completely disproved. As a tiny example, I'll disporve the 2 examples you named:
************************
Flight 93 could not have been shot down. The impact left a crater about 115 feet wide and 10 to 12 feet deep. Pieces of a shot-down plane can't do that.
*********************************
The Pentagon was not hit by a missile because:
( 1) Dozens, if not hundreds, of people stuck on I-395 saw the low-flying plane & their testimony is well-documented in the press. Quoted from Wikipedia, “American Airlines Flight 77”:

... Steve Riskus witnessed the plane crash into the Pentagon, as he was driving along Washington Boulevard and stopped to take photographs moments after the impact.[21] Mary Lyman, who was on I-395, saw the airplane pass over at a "steep angle toward the ground and going fast" and then saw the cloud of smoke from the Pentagon.[22] Jim Sutherland, also on I-395, witnessed the plane pass 50 feet overhead, heading in a straight line into the Pentagon.[23] Mary Ann Owens, of Gannett News Service, was stuck in traffic near the Pentagon when she saw the airplane pass 50 to 75 feet overhead and crash into the Pentagon.[24] Another witness, Daryl Donley, saw the crash as he was driving on Washington Boulevard. Among debris that was scattered as the plane crashed, he found a "scorched green oxygen tank marked 'Cabin air. Airline use'" on the road.[24] Mr. Donley also had a camera with him, and took some of the first photographs after the crash.[25] USA Today reporter Mike Walter, while driving on Washington Boulevard, also witnessed the crash.[26] He recounted to CNN, "...looked out my window. I saw this plane, the jet, American Airlines jet coming. And I thought, this doesn't add up. It's really low. And I saw it. It just went — I mean, it was like a cruise missile with wings, it went right there and slammed right into the Pentagon. Huge explosion."[13]
(This is about half the witnesses, to save space)
================
2) Clear wreckage of a plane was found & photographs were printed in all the papers. Here's a nice photo from 9/11 that clearly shows plane wreckage:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=6#bigplane
(scroll down after clicking)
================
3)Yes, the hole in the Pentagon was somewhat smaller than the diameter of the plane. This is explained by Professor Mere Sozen, a “Kettelhut Distinguished Professor Civil Engineering” at Perdue University. Prof. Sozen says that it’s the energy of the plane, not its size that determines the size of the hole. The plane is not a cartoon character that punches out its outline. Moving at 531 MPH it more fluid than solid and this explains why you get the hole you got. (Prof. Sozen quoted from Pop Mech book)
=====
4) The competing theory, that American Airlines Flight 77 disappeared into thin air with all its passengers, is not too convincing.
===
5)The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

This remarkable report describes some of the human remains & plane parts. It contains a blurry photo of the plane hitting the Pentagon.
************************************
ADDENDUM
DEBRIS FROM FLIGHT 93:
The debris found in New Baltimore consisted of very light materials, including paper, thin nylon, and other things that would, if in the air with the wind, would easily blow. At the time of the crash, the wind was blowing at 9 knots in the direction towards Indian Lake and New Baltimore. The debris in New Baltimore included charred pages of in-flight magazines, papers from a pilot's manual, a map showing the Guadalajara, Mexico, airport, and copies of stock portfolio monthly earnings reports. It also included some light black webbing pieces from insulation lining the belly of the jetliner
Source:
http://www.debunk911myths.org/topics/ind...
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

2007-10-05 09:19:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

The inclusion of Nostradamus?click on Nostradamus and 9/11.

2016-05-17 05:24:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

That's the beauty of a conspiracy theory. The theorists place the burden of proof on dis-proving their theory instead of on the theorist having to prove it.

If you have a question about the validity of fidelity of information you have been given, then go do your own research and find the answers before you go making a statement based on some crap you found on somebody's web page.

2007-10-05 09:10:16 · answer #3 · answered by lunatic 7 · 3 0

We may never know. It's all about what the 9-11 Commission found, where there are equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats. Although not disproven, nothing really was proven to substantiate the conspiracy theories.

2007-10-05 09:02:42 · answer #4 · answered by Andre 7 · 1 2

Nothing has been disproved from the missing plane that never hit the Pentagon to why World Trade centre 5 was pulled down in under 20 mins,,,,,It has all been covered up and been tried to be forgotten about,,,



EDIT if anyone is interested try www.reopen911.org

2007-10-05 09:03:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Well-I for one find it hard to believe that AA77 landed at some secret location, and then all the passengers were disposed of.

2007-10-05 09:08:59 · answer #6 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 3 1

Good questio. I beleive it was a conspiricy but havn't seen much to back this up so i would apprecite any websites that i could download a documentary from

2007-10-05 09:03:00 · answer #7 · answered by paul p 1 · 1 2

as a young engineer, i can't get my head around building 7, ok, i don't question what happened to the WTC but building 7, my lecturers have disgust this and are abit puzzled aswell

2007-10-05 09:07:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

U.A.V.'s are becoming far more common. I have not heard that they are of air liner size yet though.

2007-10-05 09:14:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

We don't need to disprove these theories. People who make up these theories need to prove them and they can't!!

2007-10-05 10:18:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers