No.
Neither do I want proof that Sean Hannity is a pompous (fill in the blank) who applauds a right wing felon while demeaning anyone that disagrees with him.
Do you have proof that Rush Limbaugh did not refer to every vet that disagrees with the Iraq war as "phony soldiers"?
2007-10-05 08:54:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
6⤊
3⤋
to respond to this question, i think of we could interrupt down what's being stated. What i'm getting at, there are going to information articles that are ostensibly going to be unfastened from political bias. That being stated, in case you regarded at each and every substantial community's reporting of the final Presidential election, and that i will component immediately at Dan somewhat, it replaced into as though there replaced right into a state of mourning at John Kerry's obvious loss. If that may not liberal slant, i don't comprehend what's. Fox had no such slant the two way, and for that rely, neither did MSNBC that night. enable's settle for it, no information community in this usa, not even NPR, is unfastened from a policial slant. As for FOX information, they have the optimal scores on cable. that would show you how to comprehend some thing. only because of the fact all 6 'different' channels placed out the comparable version of the information would not make it maximum suitable or be unfastened from a liberal slant. What I advise is, if FOX is this form of success, is it because of the fact perchance they furnish a various point of view? i don't think of people watch FOX because of the fact they hate it. i don't think FOX or any community has an overt coverage of mendacity. even nevertheless, i believe the different 6 channels do sense they are above reproach at cases while they like extra duty. examine out Dan somewhat's misbehavior. That replaced into mendacity and he could have been fired summarily. luckily, he's retired.
2016-10-06 04:07:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1) The media exposed what O'Reilly said. He's the one who came across as a pinhead at best and a racist at worst. So don't blame the media.
2) It doesn't look good to bash servicemembers, especially when you never served. Clearly there are real soldiers who oppose the war, just as there are real soldiers who believe in the mission. What Rush Limbaugh said was vile, and he deserves condemnation. If a leftie commentator had called them phony soldiers, conservatives would be calling for his/her head.
3) Larry Craig has voted time and time again to deny gays civil rights--he has a virulently homophobic voting record. As for Barney Frank's partner in the 1980s, Frank apparently was unaware of what his roommate was doing, and once he found out, he tossed the guy out on his butt. I don't judge the Republicans by Craig's acts; I only judge Craig.
There's a whole lot of conservative dirt that doesn't get mentioned in the so-called liberal media, while every misstep a liberal or Democrat takes gets endless coverage. One example showing the media are conservative? Howard Dean's scream being played over and over on CNN in the days after it occurred.
2007-10-05 09:19:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by VeggieTart -- Let's Go Caps! 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
WoW. Three examples and such a lenthy investigation. Impressive.
1>The media allowed the Swift Boat Veterans to smear John Kerry who volunteered to go to Vietnam and serve his country while George W. Bush stayed at home because his daddy pulled some strings.
2> Fox News called the 2000 election for George W. Bush even after CNN and other networkds had called it for Al Gore. There was very little, if no media coverage at all of Florida's turning over the voter rolls to a private company called DBT who took people off the rolls when they had every right to vote.
3> The media failed to question the Bush Administration and their shaky "evidence" leading up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
2007-10-05 09:01:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by It's Your World, Change It 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
How does that prove that the American media is liberal when 2 or your 3 points involve American media personalities? Does that mean Fox News is liberal since its an American media outlet?
2007-10-05 08:57:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Well duh.......I hope you haven't just figured this out. This has been going on for years. What's been really nice about this recent limbaugh issue is that alot of people, who for what ever reason, has never listened to limbaugh, have been tuning in just to see what all the flack was about. What they're finding is that the Dems have been exposed for what they really are..a bunch of lieing hypocrites who aren't concerned about telling any truth. I hope they keep this up for months...it's been hillarious listening to these idiots spew the lies about rush when all they have to do is spend 5 minutes reading, or listening to the original transcripts to find out what was really said. They can't do it....Pretty scary to think that these libs can't even get this right......makes you wonder what other stuff they are voting on without even knowing the facts.
2007-10-05 08:58:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
These are all diversion tactics.
All of these things and Britney Spears and OJ Simpson and the like are meant to keep the subjects misdirected and staying off the war!
2007-10-05 08:55:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kelly B 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
Didn't need anymore proof the amnesty sellout was the last straw>
2007-10-05 08:56:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by 45 auto 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Did you even listen to the audio of Bill O'reilly. It sound as if he just meet a black person for the very first time.
2007-10-05 08:55:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
OK.
Where is the proof?
You have just named 3 hypocrites who deserve all the bad press they get.
2007-10-05 08:56:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Think 1st 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
look at the top of the page of your link. the header. "clinton accused."
2007-10-05 08:55:42
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋