2007-10-05 06:58:32 · 7 answers · asked by leo 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
It doesn't prove or disprove anything.
An evolutionist looks at it and sees a common ancestor.
A creationist looks at it and sees a common creator.
2007-10-05 07:08:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting clue on the evolution matter. Question now is: how can one set of similar genomes ACCELERATE in evolution development and the other set remains dormant?
2007-10-05 07:14:05 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Wizard 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The issue you creationists don't seem to be able to grasp is that we are not descended from Apes, but that apes and humans share a common ancient ancestor.
Oh, and I don't get where your so-called proof is coming from...
Elaborate if you are capable.
2007-10-05 07:07:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes of course. Almost everybody knows that. That is a big trick of the evolutionists. But science refutes that claim. The creationists won.
2007-10-05 07:11:03 · answer #4 · answered by Dominic 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If evolution were true...there would be no more apes...or at the very LEAST as there are still apes, there there would still be all of the various evolutional stages in between....common sense.
2007-10-05 07:09:07 · answer #5 · answered by Tim H 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I don't follow yur reasoning--it proves evolution!
2007-10-05 07:04:11 · answer #6 · answered by Thomas E 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you bet ye, I am a perfect example.
2007-10-05 18:14:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋