In North America
2007-10-05 06:30:53 · 25 answers · asked by Bobbi 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
that will not work because of freedom. the last thing we need is illegal fritos and candy bars being sold under the table and the courts dealing with people who violated the law by eating ice cream. the enforcement is a nightmare.
2007-10-05 06:38:47 · answer #1 · answered by BonesofaTeacher 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No another example of Dems controlling people.
I dont think junk food is the reason for obesity.
sports drinks and sodas are the problem
I eat junk food all the time but with in limits
but nobody realises how much sugar and calories in sodas
A lot of people drink nothing but sodas
Drink more water. i will not fuss about bottled water. If you will drink water that way good
drinking more water is the answer to obesity
2007-10-05 13:41:17 · answer #2 · answered by Tommiecat 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We should continue to eliminate the most dangerous, unhealthy, or offensive things we do. Some day we will all live in bubbles. And how long will we live then? Every right, and freedom we surrender, we surrender for all future generations, until the oppression starts a revolution. And rights and freedoms are regained with blood.
We should resolve to mind our own business!
2007-10-05 13:41:33 · answer #3 · answered by DylisTN 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If people want to make junk food illegal why don't those people just stop eating it.
Oh wait...
That might be too hard for people to have to make a choice about something, Yep - better outlaw it so no choices will have to be made. (Im kidding of course)
2007-10-05 13:38:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yeah and have gangs and other criminals making profit off of selling illegal funyuns and twinkies. Also its a free country, if you want to be fat then hey its your right! They should educate people on why its bad for you but prohibition never works.
2007-10-05 14:11:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
watch out, you ask and the next thing you now some liberal will be in front of the TV cameras, saying we are doing it to "protect the children". wait a second, they are already doing it in some cities. no selling "junk food" with in a certain distance to schools or no fast food with in a community.
welcome to the nanny state. the got started with cigarettes and legally owned guns. now it is opened up to anything they want to go after.
2007-10-05 13:41:02 · answer #6 · answered by ron s 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Nah, it should be a penny a calorie. With a surtax for ingredients that require a chemistry degree to deciper.
You could just stop eating the stuff, you know.
2007-10-05 15:59:59 · answer #7 · answered by VeggieTart -- Let's Go Caps! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, The same with cigarettes, christmas trees, cars, coal plants, nuclear plants, diesle engines, barbeque grills and everthing else the is detrimental to human life. Maybe we should outlaw death.....
2007-10-05 13:40:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, and neither should lots of other things liberals would like to make (or have made) illegal.
2007-10-05 13:34:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sure if you want government too control everything that we do. Or if you believe that they should stay out of our business. That's like taxing smokers at a high rate just because they smoke.
2007-10-05 13:45:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋