English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

On MSNBC last night Pastor John Hagee said he thinks that the prolife crowd would vote for Rudy over Hillary, but I don't think he speaks for all of the prolife crowd who will possibly go third party over principle.

2007-10-05 05:25:50 · 4 answers · asked by Spartacus 3 in Politics & Government Politics

4 answers

***shuddering at the thought!!!****

2007-10-05 05:48:30 · answer #1 · answered by Buff 6 · 1 0

I think it is less likely than what happened with Perot and Nader. The Christian Right votes in unity and if they go third party Republicans will lose, but I think that is unlikely because they realize that.

2007-10-05 05:45:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

At the risk of starting something I shouldn't, I don't think abortion should be a major political issue.

After the Roe V. Wade decision, neither the president nor congress can do much to change the law, and I'm not sure they should. I am very pro-life, but I feel it is a moral decision and I don't think I want our government to try to legislate morality.

2007-10-05 06:12:34 · answer #3 · answered by mjmayer188 7 · 1 1

returned, you're able to be able to desire to comprehend what is going on on the DNC. Pledged delegates are "pledged" in elementary terms throughout the time of the 1st vote on the DNC. If a candidate does not get the generic public of delegates help after the 1st vote on the Democratic convention floor, delegates would be released from their unique decision and allowed to vote for whomever they please. So, call it fuzzy math in case you like, yet Obama could desire to, in concept, enter the DNC lacking in elementary terms one pledged delegate vote. And if he did not get that final one vote on the 1st vote to the floor; then all those "pledged" votes are long gone...the two his and hers. Then it is going to extra advantageous innings. so a ways as destroying the social gathering is going, the Democratic social gathering is destroying itself. The Democratic social gathering I grew up in grew to become into not this enormous government, loose hand outs, tax, tax, tax, not elementary left liberal stuff we've got. That Democratic social gathering labored for good, average, life like techniques to issues, and that Democratic social gathering is long long gone. The metamorphoses out of this could optimistically be a mix of the two. What we've got are 2 liberals scratching and clawing for the fantastic spot and it fairly is extremely a coach. You youthful people who're agonizing over this: This hasn't occurred in extra advantageous than 50 years. you have not seen a widespread race this close till now and you're able to be able to never see one returned. it fairly is the democratic widespread technique at its not elementary scrabble maximum suitable. take a seat returned and luxuriate interior the coach.

2016-11-07 08:34:38 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers