English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Since, in this case, it is illegal to lie or omit things?

2007-10-05 04:25:08 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

brainjames04, you're the only one so far who I feel has even tried to give a legitimate argument. could you back up your claim that free speech isn't protected by lying or obstructing justice? Is there precedent or anything else you could cite?

2007-10-05 04:44:05 · update #1

david l, our rights ARE inalienable. that's in the constitution, didnt you read that in class?

2007-10-05 04:44:56 · update #2

14 answers

Go back & read the Constitution Kenny, there's nothing in there about "inalienable rights."

The First Amendment to the Const. simply says that CONGRESS can make no law abridging freedom of speech. It does not legalize common law perjury or prohibit statutes punishing perjury, any more than it allows people to say: "Give me all your money or I'll kill you!"

2007-10-05 05:35:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NO.

Your free speech rights remain intact because you have the right to remain silent under the fifth amendment.

In many court circumstances you maybe compelled to testify, such as telling what you might have seen when witnessing a crime, but your free speech rights do not protect you when withholding the true. Also your free speech rights do not protect you when lying, obstructing justice or entering a plea agreement either.

2007-10-05 04:37:22 · answer #2 · answered by brianjames04 5 · 0 0

He has the impressive to disagree no longer impressive. the 1st modification freedom of speech supplies it to him. the priority isn't no remember if or no longer he has a top to disagree with a great courtroom Justice yet interior the way that this is comprehensive. Obama needless to say did no longer like the wonderful courtroom's ruling. The White dwelling house can concern a fact to that actuality. Calling out the wonderful courtroom for the period of the State of the Union handle, on the same time as they have been sitting there, in front of the whole American public is a infantile rank beginner pass. the only purpose there is to embarrass the courtroom this is an act under the honour of the place of work of the President. needless to say the White dwelling house would not have the criminal authority to override a great courtroom determination. in terms of "correcting" a justice, they understand infinitely greater appropriate to the regulation and the form than does any president so i do no longer think of this is his place to "impressive" them.

2016-12-17 17:58:01 · answer #3 · answered by keeven 4 · 0 0

No. Freedom of speech does not give a person the right to lie in a court of law.

2007-10-05 04:31:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Of course not. You still have the right to refuse to incriminate yourself.

What we call rights and freedoms are not inalienable, nor are they free. Each comes at a price in lives that has been paid in advance, and in responsibilities and obligations that must be met if they are to continue.

Democracy is not cheap. The cost is high, and the upkeep is constant. That is why it is so valuable.

2007-10-05 04:31:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No, the oath does not violate your right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is not, in and of itself a freedom to lie and the oath taken in court is voluntary.

2007-10-05 04:30:53 · answer #6 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 0 1

No it does not violate your rights. You are not free to make up things on the stand. That would violate someone's right to tell the truth.

2007-10-05 04:34:06 · answer #7 · answered by barelygotout 2 · 0 1

No, you can go ahead and lie and omit things. Just might cause you to go to jail for perjury.

2007-10-05 04:28:20 · answer #8 · answered by booman17 7 · 1 1

No because you are free refuse the oath, but then, you would have to accept the consequences, if any.

2007-10-05 04:30:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No, how would it. You don't have the right of free speech in court.

2007-10-05 04:28:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers