2007-10-05 04:06:12 · 13 answers · asked by Spartacus 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
! don't agree with that statement. The dynamics of the 2 situations are quite different.
2007-10-05 04:11:19 · answer #1 · answered by booman17 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I hope never, we went to Vietnam to help establish democracy in the south from the communist north. They didn't kill 3,000 people by using airliners as weand we as weapons of war,terrorists did. In Vietnam too many of my brothers and sisters died in vain, and we as a nation must not let happen again. If defending our homeland isn't a good enough reason then i don't know what is. Cut and run is not the answer.Be strong America!
2007-10-05 05:05:16 · answer #2 · answered by jakeright 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i don't think of Iraq will i think of it fairly is going to flow om for a good bit yet ,suggestions you there'll a sparkling US President quickly so because it is worth gazing to work out what united statesa. is waiting to do in Iraq,Afghanistan could have a extensive concerning united statesa.'s involvement interior the middle east. remember Iraq has oil that the west desperately desires so one persons the united kingdom or united statesa. will i think of likely stay extra to that united statesa. are very nervy approximately Iran so i think of it fairly is going to come right down to the regulations of the recent US government.remember additionally that the generic public of the two the U. S. and the united kingdom have become peeved with this conflict and if Iraq gave the impact of it may improve to a 2d Viet-Nam public outcry could desire to turn to anarchy in the two the U. S. and the U. S. the information would be worth gazing and listening to after the U. S. elections? the international can't have yet another Viet - Nam it may desire to improve right into a 0.33 international conflict?.
2016-11-07 08:28:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are similar in that both military actions were not to the benefit of American foreign policy. Vietnam was far more a waste than Iraq, though. However, negative repucussions might be worse, fro Iraq, in the long run...
2007-10-05 04:13:21 · answer #4 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
in about 30 years, the same amount of time it took most historians and politicians to agree on that about Vietnam.
2007-10-05 04:09:06 · answer #5 · answered by Free Radical 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oh, you were in Vietnam? I think not so you can't say jack. They are nothing alike only the goddamn liberal media says it is.
2007-10-05 05:24:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It will be not much longer than a year when a new president takes office.
Well that is only true if we go out and VOTE!
2007-10-05 04:11:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
As soon as it is recognized that Bush is a lobotomized sock puppet and his handlers wanted to him to justify their profiteering. Hopefully in 2008.
2007-10-05 04:13:43 · answer #8 · answered by momatad 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Never because George Bush is a vain, ignorant, moron.
2007-10-05 04:17:16 · answer #9 · answered by Baysoc23 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Its because they are NOT the same
2007-10-05 04:10:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋