They have taken something so far out of context that even the soldier Rush was originally talking about accused Rush of accusing him of being a suicide bomber! lol! What's the deal?
2007-10-05 02:58:55 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ken - Apparently your blind hatred is glowing. There is no defense of Rush, only the pointing out a talk show host being taken out of context to demonize Conservatives. He said nothing that other news organizations haven't already said about that phoney soldier.
2007-10-05 03:05:17 · update #1
Big Pisano - You assume that I am a liberal and don't acknowledge errors. Your link is of left bias and isn't all too credible. There is no proof in that link of what Rush said of the soldier hit by a suicide bomber, only word of mouth accusations.
2007-10-05 03:08:28 · update #2
big morano - So from a left biased website you primarily supplied you give me FOUR anti-Republican/Conservative wesites. The Google search you ran only pulls up the most hits. Guess what people like you do to get those hits in such high numbers?: You do it all the time to hate on people when you have no clue what you're talking about. I suggested back to you that I was most likely wrong of the name of the phoney soldier. Why are you defending a false "hero" anyway?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,298999,00.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1903475/posts
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_100407/content/01125107.guest.html
Quit wasting my time.
2007-10-05 03:31:02 · update #3
Pig pisano - LOL Best answer! lol! You do know that media matters is a left biased website and contorts any truth that they post. You get the joke of the day award, thank you for the laughs.
2007-10-05 03:59:17 · update #4
That is all they have left they can't debate him on the issuses so they have gone to twisting his quotes around.
Now DNC is shown to be the lapdog of Soros and company.
They can't admit to it. There standard response is what about the Republicans ya da ya da ya da.
Sounds to me more like kids caught with their hands caught in the cookie jar saying well Johnny did it.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
I didn't review the posts before I submitted mine.
You will notice NOT ONE took on Rush by the pionts he makes. It is the typical liberal name calling but NOT ONE can say anything against what Rush had to say.
Liberals are getting to predicaticable it isn't even funny anymore.
2007-10-05 03:40:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
I've always thought that given enough rope they would hang themselves! These people are acting insane and the media who sides in with them is only helping their looniness! These same people blame the president and republicans for the tarnished US image, if they could only see it's their goofy actions that make us look like complete idiots! The media loves to 'inform' the world of this kind of stuff!
2007-10-05 11:47:50 · answer #2 · answered by Brianne 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Actually, Rush called a different soldier a suicide bomber. A soldier who actually was wounded by a real suicide bomber. Get your facts straight, son.
My question back to you is will you actually acknowledge your error?
edit: no actually you are completely wrong. the man has been interviewed. and it is all too easy to blame my link on left wing. you see, the difference between you and i is that i know what i am talking about. all i did was type 'rush' and 'suicide bomber' in to google and took the first link it gave me. i can list thousands of links if you'd like and all that would do is make you look more ignorant and waste my own time. this is an absolute fact that you don't know which guy you are talking about so please do yourself a favor and actually look in to this rather than denying the truth. the guy you think you are talking about is jesse macbeth. the guy rush actually compared to a suicide bomber is brian mcgough. now will you admit you are wrong?
...and as for you Time_Wounds, your link brings me to a little bio on Macbeth. No where in there does it mention the suicide bombing reference we are all referring to. All of my links do, in regards to McGough. I think you just helped my point perhaps? Thanks, you're my new buddy for life.
... hehehe, this is getting kind of fun now. You are so far off and so wrong you are resorting to name calling and spouting conspiracy theories of legions of liberals clicking on anti-republican links to make them higher on google's news search. You're out of your league on this question man. You don't even know what you're fighting about anymore. Your own links support what I said and further makes every word of your question totally irrelevant. Just admit it, it isn't just the name you got wrong, you got your entire story wrong. By all rights you should end this question now and give me "best answer" but I know you won't. So anyway, the defense rests, I hope to see more of your insight around the site later. As a matter of fact, I'm looking forward to it.
ps... I just want to point out that at no point did I ever start throwing down liberal/conservative stereotyping. That's the easy way of doing things. I use facts. Let this be a lesson to everyone.
You don't like my links? Fine, I changed it to one of your own, and it still makes the same point. You must be getting to the bottom of your barrel of excuses. It's ok, man, we'll get through this... together.
2007-10-05 10:03:20 · answer #3 · answered by Big Paesano 4 · 9⤊ 6⤋
Taking something out of context? I feel really bad for Rush, as he has always kept everything completely in context and has never resorted to name calling and slander...what a shame.....bwahahahahahaha
2007-10-05 10:18:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
What's funny to me is that liberal politicians are doing more to try and shut Rush Limbaugh down than the FCC ever did to try and shut Howard Stern down! On one hand you have a guy with a syndicated radio show (before he went to Syrious) in dozens of major US cities who uses toilet humor, sound effects, and lesbians in tickle machines to increase his ratings. He uses fowl language, uses the "N" word, and makes personal attacks against anybody he feels like attacking. Then on the other hand you have a syndicated radio talk show host who simply points out the hypocrisy of the left in this country, and suddenly he's public enemy #1? Wow. As Don King would say "Only in America!"
2007-10-05 10:10:33 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 5⤊ 6⤋
Rush Limbaugh is about as relevant to any genuine discussion as Paris Hilton is. He's an entertainer - why do so many people on here even take him seriously?
2007-10-05 10:12:53 · answer #6 · answered by hiztreebuff 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
Rush brings the liberals to the bar of justice, and they can't stand it ! They try to smaer the messenger with lies.
Libs don't like having truth , facts, and logic reveal the just how wrong they are so they attempt to weasel out of it.
Sorry libs, moveon.org and Al Franken can't save you on this one !
2007-10-05 10:16:56 · answer #7 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 4⤊ 5⤋
Rush daily states shallow and inflammatory liberal bating speech, it is so unfortunate, so many take him so seriously.
2007-10-05 10:29:35 · answer #8 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yet,they could care less calling a 4 star General names. Go figure!
2007-10-05 10:05:49 · answer #9 · answered by Nikki 4 · 6⤊ 5⤋
People in this day and age come to expect total denial from the left and zero accountability for their two-faced (hypocritical) actions.
Can I say, "Verbal Bowel Syndrome?"
2007-10-05 10:13:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋