English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/ahmadinejad-holocausts-m_b_66630.html
Alan Dershowitz, a man who has built his career on libel, now contends that the suffering of the Palestinians is justified by the Nazi inclinations of a Palestinian leader of the '30s. Wasn't Nazism incredibly popular in the US at the time? Weren't important figures like Prescott Bush, John D. Rockefeller and Henry Ford active supporters of the Nazi party? Aren't racist and neo-nazi organizations such as the KKK still prevalent in the US? Under Dershowitz premise, shouldn't the US offer some its land for the creation of a Jewish state?

2007-10-05 01:37:18 · 5 answers · asked by Washington Irving 3 in News & Events Current Events

Existence of the Jewish state? What's with the propaganda? Have you ever heard of any other country demanding its indigenous people, evicted and persecuted "accept" the existence of the occupation?
The PLO has for three decades accepted a two-state solution!!! Quite clearly they are not bent on the annihilation of Jews. To repeat this silly mantra about the "right to exist" when there is no precedent in WORLD HISTORY for such demands is clearly a red herring.

Arabs and Palestinians have been offering peace since Camp David. It is widely documented outside of the US. To impose a humiliating pre-condition to talks proposed in good faith is to guarantee the impossibility of peace.

Israel is being recognized even if it sustains its Jews-Only Zionist Apartheid. Why is the right to exist of the Palestinian state being denied? Furthermore, why are Gazans being starved and isolated by the IDF? Why isn't Israel being punished for its violations of a plethora of UN resolutions?!?!?

2007-10-05 03:16:59 · update #1

5 answers

No. But the Palestinians and their Arab brethren's refusal to accept the existence of a Jewish state does. All the Pals have to do is stop the terrorism. Peace will be an immediate consequence.

2007-10-05 03:04:09 · answer #1 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 0 0

Using the Holocaust is just another excuse for genocide against the Palestinians.
These people were in Israel when the Jews moved in on them, taking homes, displacing hundreds of thousands of Palestinians.
I have been to Israel and also have friends who are Palestinian, they told me stories before I went there, and I found them very true. One friend told me of an ancestral home in En Karim. The home had been in the family for generations. The Jews walked in one day and announced they no longer owned this home.
I walked down the streets in Tel Avie, I saw were stores owned by Jews were open, and stores owned by Arabs were closed.
I heard of one woman (the one whose house was taken) trying to cross the bridge to get into Jordan, she had grapes from the land "she did own" at this bridge a military (Jew) took the grapes from her saying " Your people can buy their own grapes in Jordan."
I could go on and on.

2007-10-05 05:05:18 · answer #2 · answered by djc1175 6 · 2 0

No it doesn't. Just watch these responses come through though.
Jews are like the all-suffering only-suffering of WWII.
I'm not saying they didn't suffer, but so did others, look at the gypsies, for heavens sake, where's their seperate state?
If USA was so lovey-dovey about giving Jews a state, don't take someone else's land, give em a chunk of Alaska.
It's funny but the state of Israel is based on fascism itself. Weird things happen.

2007-10-05 01:45:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

I don't believe that the U.S. should offer land, but it should take its immigrants or those who want to flee until this is over.
It's ethnic cleansing going on and it is sickening.

2007-10-05 02:20:39 · answer #4 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 4 0

Yes, it justifies it.

2007-10-05 01:41:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers