Not I. Too big a conspiracy would have been required and too many people involved for it to have gone undetected.
Aside from the facts themselves that just plain point out the facts are consistant with the 9/11 pannel findings.
2007-10-05 00:49:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by wizjp 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
The funny thing is, these people who say it was a government conspiracy, usually hate Bush but are willing to give him the credit of being such a genius to pull this off. The way I see it, Bush has not done anything else right, I'm sure he would have blundered the attacks it he did that. The people who say the government had explosions planted in the buildings don't understand structural engineering and assume buildings can not be damaged to the point of collapse.
I don't buy into this story that the passengers on the Shanksville plane fought back because they wanted to prevent a plane from hitting the white house. They fought back because they thought they were going to die, but I doubt they gave a damn about saving Washington.
And most of the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia but Bush tried to imply that Iraq was part of 9-11 and know the president of Iran wants to pay his respects at ground zero and everyone has a fit like Iran was involved. All the while we love Saudi Arabia, which is definitely a country we should be calling a state sponsor of terrorism and a violator of human rights.
2007-10-05 08:45:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Michael G 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I sure don't.
This tired subject has been done to death.
The things I see people posting as "proof" of a conspiracy are unconvincing to preposterous, and usually involve:
--puffs of dust
--incredibly dishonest internet movies made by young amateurs (instead of real expert publications)
--outright lies like "there were no bodies or plane parts found at the Pentagon" (this claim is ludicrous)
--claims that steel can't melt even though noone is saying it did
--claims of thermite in the twin towers even though the "distinctive fingerprint" of thermite is missing, as admitted by Prof Jones
--a book by a retired Professor of Philosophy (Griffin) who thinks he knows more that the American Society of Civil Engineers
--that Flight 93 was shot down by a missile even though it made a gigantic crater (pieces can't do that)
--that we could have shot down the planes even though noobody knew where they were with their transponders turned off, until it was too late
--that WTC7 shouldn't have fallen (because the jets didn't hit it) even though 5 other buildings fell without being hit (The Marriott World Trade Center, St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center. )
Etc, etc, etc.
2007-10-05 15:55:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by J 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
This question has appeared over and over and the answer is always the same, it was as the commission stated, there was nothing covert about it at all.
The evidence is quite clear that this was entirely the work of terrorists. The fact that they have also admitted to doing it seems to have no impact on those that want it to be a conspiracy.
The only positive thing that seems to result from this tiresome question is that increasing numbers of reasonable people respond but rejecting the conspiracy mind set.
2007-10-05 16:12:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Randy 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
More to the point - how many people here are bored with seeing the same old questions come up over and over and over and over and over and over again? Does this move us any further forward at all or provide any purpose?
In the nicest possible way, I don't really care what you think about it. I prefer to look at the evidence myself and make my own mind up, rather than listen to the opinions of others.
Now then,
Who believes the moon landings weren't real?
Who thinks that Elvis is still alive?
Who thinks JFK wasn't shot by Lee Harvey Oswald?
2007-10-05 08:34:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by the_lipsiot 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hello everyone, With full respect for those lives lost on Sept. 11, this is not an easy question to answer. My friends sister was on one of the planes as an attendant. My heart goes out to her and all the families , who even to this day need our support.
Recently, I watched Loose Change, a documentary about the evidence from all the four planes damage ,and this threw a wrench in works. I hate to think it but after the lying from this administration about Iraq and this war happening which costs billions, there is only the question WHY? It's to cause a Trumanisc affect on the world ( bomb them anyway attitude), to create fear. The only problem with that is their attitude is coming from ignorance and deceit and that is always an end in itself and only we (the honest ones) will have to clean it up. I'm not fearing them or the problem it's just this can be avoided.
Communicate, communicate, communicate with your Representatives, Senators, Mayors, and Police as often as you can about how you feel. Be informed about what you say with assertiveness not anger, and keep a positive thought in your mind everyday.
Thank you , Catherine
2007-10-05 08:23:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cat 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
if you believe that there has been any kind of a cover-up around the 9/11 attacks then you necessarily believe that the george w. bush administration has taken on a hugely complex and sophisticated operation and discharged it with spectacular success.
if you believe george w. bush is brainy you probably voted for him.
2007-10-05 08:25:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by synopsis 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Conspiracies are amusing but they require intelligence - - - I perceive more of a lack of intelligence - - - ignorance as to how to react to words & warnings. If Gore had been Prez those warning would most likely have been understood & analyzed, as it was those intelligence operatives spreading words of warning were hold overs from the Clinton Years and never could shout loud enough to penetrate the ears of Geo W Bush and his Gang. As for Geo W and Gang, they could hardly organize a Lesbian rape in a Nunnery let alone map out the attack - - - that said I will agree that the collapse of # 7 does hint that there were explosives in place just in case and that in this case those explosives were set off. # 7 was a 'sensitive' building and many such places are likely boobytrapped.
///------O . u . O ------ \\\ Peace..........................
2007-10-05 07:54:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by JVHawai'i 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I don't believe it was a inside job, but I do blame the Clinton administration for not getting Bin Laden when they had him. This could have been prevented if was put away when we had the chance. I don't understand the conspiracy theory with people. People hate us and want to bring us down - end of story.
2007-10-05 08:26:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by DAR76 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
View this:
http://www.archive.org/details/drgriffin
2007-10-06 15:45:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋