Why are the police in the US so aggressive? police trying to stop vehicles have this obsession of carrying out the P.I.T manoeuvre just about anywhere causing the offending car to crash into innocent drivers, why do they do that?
Ken
2007-10-04 19:50:07 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Because they know they can get away with it. You can shoot or taser an unresisting victim or break a kid's arm for dropping crumbs in America.
And that ain't movies, that's films of cops being caught in the act. Consumer recording devices are beginning to show the extent of the abuses.
A cop can do anything and they will never be made to account for it.
2007-10-05 00:09:31 · answer #1 · answered by Runa 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
OK, i take it you are in the UK...
For a start, have you seen the British Police method (Tactical contact)?? Its the same thing..
Why should Police Officers NOT P.I.T. The car, it is a lot safer than allowing someone to drive in a manner that is likely to kill some innocent motorist, when the Police P.I.T. a car they try to make sure it is safe, however it is a fluid situation and sometimes things go wrong!!!!
I'd stop your whining and start to back the Police Officers who protect your rights and not try to blame them for the deeds of the people who want to break the law and infringe your rights!!!!
P.S. British Police Officers don't use Tactical contact as much as the US Police because our roads are quite a bit narrower, thereby increasing the risk of injury..
(I'm British!)
The other point is that you say they are aggressive, how do you justify that?? Have you spoken to a US Cop? they are no more aggressive than any other Police Force anywhere, i have friend's who are Cops in the US and the UK and i'd say that they are just as professional as each other, the only real difference is that the US Cops have to deal with a lot more gun crime than UK Cops, this is something that is changing here in the UK, gun crime is constantly rising... You should ask yourself if YOU would want to face a gun nearly every time you went to work......
2007-10-04 21:54:14 · answer #2 · answered by John W 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
They don't. The PIT manoeuvre is carried out when they really need to stop someone, and rarely causes involvement with another vehicle. It is not an American original technique, it came from Germany to the US.
The PIT is not applicable in every situation. Typical policy is not to attempt the PIT at greater than 35 miles per hour. Its effective use requires choice of location, considering possible effects on other traffic and pedestrians. Because of the potential liability for the injury or death of the occupants of the target vehicle but also bystanders, most departments limit its use to only the most high-risk scenarios. Most departments specify that the PIT should only be used to stop pursuits that are immediately dangerous and ongoing. When possible, three pursuers should be present when a PIT is executed: one as the PIT vehicle and two following at a greater distance to react to the results.
So where do you get the information used to form you opinion? American television shows? Movies? There are better ways to research than watching actors play out scenes written for them.
Or perhaps you watch shows like "America's Scariest Police Chases", which show the apprehension of violent offenders, feloniously danger drivers, murderers and rapists. Yes, I am sure if they just slowed down and asked nicely, the offenders would simply pull over for them. LOLOL!!
2007-10-04 20:25:21 · answer #3 · answered by Fred C 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
not sure what planet your from but you do need to be sure of your facts before putting your thoughts on the web,in the first case,the P.I.T.is not the first line of defence,its not used just anywhere,its a last resort and is only used when the only likely hood of injuries is to the prat being chased and only then when there is no risk to innocent members of the public,by the way,public flogging has gone out style now as well,thought that may be helpful as you dont seem to get out much.
2007-10-07 06:11:31 · answer #4 · answered by the devil wears camo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Drunks are picked up via all policeman right here in Arkansas so this one being black does not propose something to me. Are you thinking the Black policeman is choosing on you because of the fact your attractive? do you comprehend him for my section? If not, hes merely doing his activity.if so do ya ll have a history? It fairly seems such as you being a bar proprietor, could desire to evaluate reducing off a number of your shoppers till now they hit that minivan full of infants. playstation i'm happy for you ,that your so attractive even with the shown fact that it does not sound like your an exceedingly solid man or woman!!!!
2016-11-07 07:48:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The police in this country are becoming more aggressive in every aspect because the Federal government as well as the State is allowing it. Take a look at the latest Executive Orders established by the President. The Patriot Act allowed authorities to listen to any audio transmission by simply labeling that person a terrorist. The latest Executive Order abolishes the Fourth Amendment therefore authorizing authorities to search and seize without warrant by simply labeling one as a terrorist. I see Marshal Law coming to a theatre near you by April of 2008!
2007-10-04 22:23:59 · answer #6 · answered by BRICK 2 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Anyone who purposely causes another to get injured has sociological issues. Something like little mans syndrome.
Come on now, I'm going to crash into this guy, and potentially harm others to stop this guy from potentially doing the same?
There is NEVER a good reason to intentionally put innocent people in harms way.Those who do, don't care if they harm the innocent. As long as they get their man, the pat on the back and one up on their fellow officers.
What if 's, may cause or potentially dangerous, are excuses used while they act out their little cops and robbers, heroes and villains dukes of hazard type games.
Used by those officers who lack the intelligence and maturity it takes to end the situation safely.
Added: So it's OK to have innocent dead people as long as you catch one guy?
And communist if you believe that's wrong?
The majority here say there's something terribly wrong with the police these days. I'm sure the ones speaking here aren't part of the problem. Maybe they could help fix it. Instead of pretending it does not exist. The majority can't all be wrong..
TO COPGIRL: I certainly wouldn't want innocent people to die if someone broke into my house. It's only stuff, not nearly as important as life. COPGIRL you've just proven our point for us. Your attitude and lack of concern for human life is shameful. You no longer serve and protect you've become predators.
2007-10-04 23:53:00 · answer #7 · answered by Zani WM 2 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Glad to see the criminals and communists are reading posts here. You guys are all wet.
Read use of force policies, case law, and the laws surrounding use of force. CitiCop had it right to start with. I guess if we had it your way we would let people run other motorists down and not arrest people for car jacking, armed robbery, aggravated assault, or whatever they are fleeing from the Police for. It's not like we chase random motorists that are taking their kids to the beach.
2007-10-05 00:34:58 · answer #8 · answered by El Scott 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Just refer to CITICOP and ELSCOTT for your answer. What if someone broke into YOUR home and we WEREN'T aggressive in wanting to catch them? Then you would be coming here and posting yet some more BS about "The police didn't do anything!" WHAAAAmbulance is on its way for ya.
2007-10-05 07:24:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well, I guess we should just let any violent offender who opts to flee in a vehicle go free then.
Wouldn't want to be "aggressive" in apprehending dangerous criminals, after all.
I can't tell you how glad I am, Ken, that you are in charge of no aspect of public safety in America.
2007-10-04 19:57:06 · answer #10 · answered by Citicop 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋