Yep, Stalin too, and the leaders of all other countries with such atrocities (Rwanda comes to mind).
2007-10-04 17:24:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by ArLorax 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've always wondered about this, and the answer is no. If WWII hadn't happened, would Jews have societal rights that they didn't have back then? Maybe. Would a different "Hitler" have risen to power instead - one that had jets and rockets and atomic bombs before starting his attacks? Mess with a "time line" and you may wind up with something even worse. WWII was awful, but a "necessary" war. It united the world against the concept of institutionalized racism, exposed the true horrific nature of the Nazi's cruelty by committing murder on an industrialized scale, and showed that by uniting the "good guys" power we can defeat even the most awful of evils. I might like to go back in time to take a look around, but I wouldn't change anything so that something even worse won't happen.
2007-10-04 17:29:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Paul Hxyz 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Keep from from being a chanselor maybe.
How do we not know that Hitler honestly felt he was doing his country good at first.
There is not a single soul in this world that knows what was going on in that mans mind, heart and soul.
It is obvious that he hated himself so badly for what happened that he shot himself, and his wife and children also killed themselves.
Isn't this enough vengence for hateful hearts.
The answer realy is; no. Because most people have so much hate in thier heart that they even hope these souls burn in fire forever.
2007-10-04 17:29:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by lovingfeathers 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No because what he did is a part of who and what the world became. He shocked us. Because of that we have new laws, standards, and ways of life. With all the bad and tragedy, there is always a shimmer of hope and goodness to come out. I wouldn't want to change the world back to what it was then. Now if some guy was doing that now, sure take the sucker out before history repeats itself.
2007-10-04 17:25:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
personally i wouldn't because hes going to die anyway and you change time or stop destant relatives meeting or some other tiny details that could change history forever. and in the first place don't go, being there is already changing the future. the nut case is going to kill himself anyway and is going to lose, the lives lost will be avenged especially the lives of soldiers and civilians.
2007-10-04 17:25:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by marine 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd put him out of his misery and save a lot of good people from suffering the misery he inflicted. In a heartbeat.
2007-10-04 17:26:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
what would be the consequences of your actions? maybe if you killed hitler you wouldnt be born and wouldnt have been able to go back in time to kill him.
stop creating paradoxes
edit
also he did do SOME good things for germany, he gave lots of people jobs and the like
2007-10-04 17:23:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jay 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, I wouldn't. Murder is not OK. But I might do something to wake the Germans up before he got so in control that he couldn't be stopped. And it was millions, not thousands.
2007-10-04 17:24:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tasha 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hitler? I could never personally kills anyone but I'd sure go back with a plan to keep him from ever gaining control like he did.
2007-10-04 17:23:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mystee_Rain 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would kill him.
I wouldnt enjoy it. And I would probably hae to see alot of other people suffer before I could have the nerve.
But, YES!! I would kill him.
He is the Earths version of the DEVIL to me.
I hope he is still burning in hell.
Stacie
2007-10-04 17:24:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by stacie m 4
·
1⤊
1⤋