I believe out of all the ones I know, I would go with DNA. If the offspring is different from the average DNA by more than a tenth of a percent, the offspring would die.
Since their are no species whose DNA is that close to humans or other species, I think that shows Evolution is a wrong
I know there are many more facts that disprove evolution. I'd like to hear the 1 you believe to be most telling..
2007-10-04 16:43:39 · 21 answers · asked by majestic kev 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Brother Manuel, my mind is made up. I never said it wasn't. I've always thought of evolution as 1 big joke. I just want to give others a chance to sound off and compare notes. Humbert Humbert is lost lost. Where are all these mutants evolutionist point to?
There are many credible facts against it. How about the science of probability? The probability of producing one human cell by chance is 1 out of 10, to the 119,000 power.
2007-10-04 17:20:26 · update #1
354gr The Bible is believable because it is a written historical account which bring us to another point. Evolution is dependent on the earth being billions of years old. There is no written record , no carved stones, no battles, no wars, no countries, no nothing of man's existence on earth before 4,000 BC.
2007-10-04 17:31:11 · update #2
Proof for Aleks. The species closest to DNA with Humans is the chimpanzee which is 97.5% alike so that is a 2.5% difference. That is 25 times a difference. No possibility an offspring could survive that genetic difference. So unless you have some evidence of a species which was closer, which scientists do not, there is your proof.
2007-10-04 17:44:48 · update #3
In order of strength:
1. Irreducible Complexity in microbiological processes.
2. Polonium-218 Halos in primordial granite
3. Astronomical probabilities calculated as necessary for the simplest proteins to form (not enough time).
4. Fossil Record
5. Existence of information more complicated than a computer language encoded in DNA requires an author.
6. Genetics, i.e. losses always involved in mutations, fatality rate when mutations occur.
7. 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
These are just some that come to mind right off the bat.
2007-10-04 16:51:21 · answer #1 · answered by Wiseacre 2 · 8⤊ 7⤋
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
What is the Best Evidence to disprove Evolution?
I believe out of all the ones I know, I would go with DNA. If the offspring is different from the average DNA by more than a tenth of a percent, the offspring would die.
Since their are no species whose DNA is that close to humans or other species, I think that shows Evolution is a wrong
I...
2015-08-18 05:09:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We believe in God because we want to. Not because their is some scientific proof that He exists. We believe that things tend to get worse over time not better. The tree will wither, the flower will fade the 20 year old will get wrinkles, and we will all DIE. There is no way around it. No scientific advance that will prevent a body from dying. Just like there is not a way we can create life. We can clone, or recreate but without that seed nothing will grow. We cant create a blade of grass without a tiny seed. Someone created that seed as simple or complex as they get, it didnt just happen over time. People are the same now as they were 2000 years ago. Scientists can only figure out the most logical and correct answer they believe. If they are an atheist they will try to disprove God created the world. I think they have done a good job with that.
2016-03-19 04:19:36 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you look at the evidence first, and then decide whether evolution is feasible. Because your question seems to suggest that your mind is made up, and you are only looking for evidence that supports your position.
2007-10-04 16:57:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Actually, comparative DNA is another piece of evidence that evolution is, in fact, the best theory out there regarding the number and type of species present in the world today.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolution-research.html
2007-10-04 16:54:07 · answer #5 · answered by the_way_of_the_turtle 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
DNA is a stake through the heart of the straw man called Evolution. He was never alive, but just like the Wizard of Oz people keep on putting on a very good show. But now science is letting us look behind the curtain.
2007-10-04 16:54:40 · answer #6 · answered by realchurchhistorian 4 · 5⤊ 5⤋
emm...
Prove that there were no species those DNA was close to human or other species?
Do you have data on closeness of hominids DNA to each other and to Homo Sapiens?
2007-10-04 16:58:05 · answer #7 · answered by Aleks 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
What is the "average DNA"? Having different DNA might mean a mutation, which could be beneficial.
2007-10-04 16:51:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You would use DNA to disprove evolution? Funny that most all geneticists would disagree with you.
What you need to do is actually read about evolution by natural selection. There are NO credible facts that disprove it.
2007-10-04 16:46:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 6⤋
How long is a strand of DNA?
don't forget to breath today (and use your freewill).
2007-10-04 17:26:27 · answer #10 · answered by robert p 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋