English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-04 16:28:36 · 17 answers · asked by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

It was Gandhi.

2007-10-04 16:38:07 · update #1

17 answers

Mahatma Gandhi.

^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^

2007-10-04 16:47:40 · answer #1 · answered by NHBaritone 7 · 1 0

in case you unquestionably discover it condescending and complicated, i contemplate whether you're lacking the area of the word all mutually. seems such as you will have something against anybody who's Christian, who would say this or sense this way, as a ability of shielding your self. and what not.... i think of the word is an extremely good, common occasion of what Christ is all approximately. you notice, biblically, all of us have sinned. Yep, even the Jerry Falwells and John Hagees of the international. A person won't be able to exist without committing some form of sin throughout his existence - even throughout his walk with Christ. What the word ability, or is meant to let us know, is that even however we are sinners ("we" being genuinely everyone) Christ nevertheless loves us, and his present of redemption continues to be obtainable to us. someone who truly has Christ in his/her heart may be the 1st to admit that they are not suited NOR sinless - they're purely forgiven. that's needed element out right here that sin isn't ranked everywhere in scripture. that's each and all the comparable interior the eyes of God. WE would have diverse emotions approximately it (killing somebody is a plenty worse sin, than say, mendacity to a instructor approximately what handed off on your homework), yet sin is sin, none worse, none greater useful, and maximum critically, non previous Christ's ability to redeem.

2016-10-21 02:22:21 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I don't believe it was Gandhi.
In any case, I think its a dumb
saying. Why? Because the
word teaches that we should
COVER the sin the same way
HE gave us His covering. The difference being that
He forgives us totally of any sin if we ask him.
We are not to ridicule any
person who is in open sin.
It is not our job to judge or
condemn. It is our job to
love that person and help if
we can. If we cannot, we
pray until the person finds a new and better way to live.
Also, any person in deep sin
is usually at the mercy of the
enemy (satan), and only a
Christian has the power to
demand satan release his
hold on that person.

2007-10-04 17:29:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Tammy Faye Bakker

2007-10-04 16:32:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Who knows....its a good phrase though. We should love all ppl. If more ppl just loved their fellow man we wouldn't be at war right now and my hubby would be home with me :(

2007-10-04 16:37:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

OOOOHHHH hate the *SIN* love the *sinner*???? boy are my cheeks red! I've been way off on that one. Does this mean I have to start hating gay sex?

2007-10-04 16:34:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It was actaully Ghandi. I happened to hear that on NPR the other day.

2007-10-04 16:39:17 · answer #7 · answered by Eric G 2 · 1 0

i don't believe that phrase is original. It sounds like a spinoff of don't hate the player, hate the game

2007-10-04 16:31:36 · answer #8 · answered by uz 5 · 0 2

a christain whos friend was sinning i suppose

2007-10-04 16:31:42 · answer #9 · answered by cast.no.shadow 5 · 0 1

Love the ? but have no idea, sorry

2007-10-04 16:33:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers