Who would you nominate for one if they did?
2007-10-04 14:08:52 · 21 answers · asked by lindsey p 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Today's Prophet for starters...........And for some reason my mind is suddenly blank and I can't think of anymore. lol.
Crimsonandclover?
2007-10-04 14:18:04 · answer #1 · answered by . 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The "bottoms" I know contribute much more than most top contributors anyway. They just do it with more flair and fun, which is why they're at the bottom... They have to keep starting over due to lack of humor, ..AND Y!A's ridiculous report system... where you can lose an account over a pissed-off 12 year old, a freaky stalker, or a Mommie that got upset cuz she asked for truth and got it. Some of those Top Contributer Mommies scare me... I love the bottoms! The bottom is totally under-rated. I just went off on Y!A cuz I felt like it.
2016-04-07 04:36:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not recommend one at all. If there was one, a bottom contributor would have no chance to be a good contributor, or the answerer will not be believed just because of the fact that he's a bottom. I think a bottom contributor is just a thing to put in so that "worthless" answerers who don't care about getting answers are known.
2007-10-04 14:15:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I think that "top contributor" is a silly badge anyway. It just show that one spends a lot of time over here. The best answers goes for friends many times and people have many accounts so it is not even fair in all cases.
I think that " regular contributor" would be good and not with such a big sign, just a small color dot to see how regular.
2007-10-06 01:45:28 · answer #4 · answered by Isthatso 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Good question, I'd think you'd get one for answering 1 question or 1 best answer in a section.
Still not clear what you need to the top contributer badge though.
But to continue the BDSM theme of the first answer I'm a top, but I have a bottom.
2007-10-04 14:15:19 · answer #5 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I personally think the criteria for top contributor should be reviewed.. if they were to have a bottom contributor, I'd have to go with Today's Prophet who simply cuts and pastes the same answer over and over, and fireball226 who's made a career out of point gaming with one liners like "idk, but this is religion here".
2007-10-05 09:14:17 · answer #6 · answered by Kallan 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes Today's Prophet is a good one and also CJ is a contender in my book but, I think criteria for bottom contributor should be people who hardly ever ask questions but just are black holes for everyone elses. I don't like that when they never ask their own questions but just suck off everyone else like a mosquito
2007-10-04 14:44:56 · answer #7 · answered by Midge 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Why not?
Many of the best question and answer came from "people" with less than 150 points.
2007-10-04 14:20:54 · answer #8 · answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The "Top Reporters" should be candidates for those badges!
2007-10-04 14:27:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Out of all fairness, there needs to be a "versatile contributor".
2007-10-06 05:31:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋