They say there's already a cure for AIDS/HIV, but it's being kept hush-hush because they feel it would encourage more people (especially teens like me) to have unprotected sex without fear of any type of consequence and that a cure might contribute to overpopulation as millions upon millions of people who would have died, will now live. What do you think?
2007-10-04 11:39:22 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Diseases & Conditions ➔ Other - Diseases
Cancer. Aids may be fairly pervasive, especially in Africa, but it can ultimately be contained and eliminated if people will just get educated.
2007-10-04 11:48:11 · answer #1 · answered by Salsa Shark 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Besides the obvious answer given above, that HIV is passed via preventable measures, it would only make sense logically to cure cancer. There are far more people suffering from and dying from cancer than there are of HIV/AIDS. From a strictly humanitarian POV, more suffering would be eased and more lives saved with a cancer cure rather than an HIV cure.
2007-10-04 11:49:15 · answer #2 · answered by bob_ber_down 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you really think that if a cure for AIDS/HIV was invented they wouldn't be using it??? Okay so lets have millions of people die from something even though we have a cure sitting on the shelf that will save their lives.
2007-10-04 11:48:29 · answer #3 · answered by Jay's Girl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would rather there be a cure for cancer because AIDS could be stopped by merely observing safe sex practices, whereas it is difficult to specificly do anything to prevent getting most types of cancer (except a few varieties).
2007-10-04 11:46:41 · answer #4 · answered by Flying Dragon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there could only be one I say let it be cancer.Cancer isn't a disease passed on through choice or by choice.Whereas AIDS is.The choice not to use protection in the form of condoms is ignorant and can lead to a slow and painful death or worse a pregnancy where the child also has HIV or AIDS...
Cancer isn't passed through stupidity or by choice.SO if there could only be one let it be a cure for cancer.
M.G
2007-10-04 11:46:28 · answer #5 · answered by Malia G 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A cure for cancer...Having aids/hiv in most cases is preventable.You cant really prevent cancer.
2007-10-04 11:45:34 · answer #6 · answered by Your dad thinks I'm hot 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Aids is definitely worse. for many motives, one being you're able to be able to desire to have likely have prevented getting AIDS, the place its not continually plausible to sidestep getting maximum cancers, it merely occurs on occasion. additionally maximum cancers isn't contagious, so which you do not' could trouble approximately passing it directly to anybody like AIDS. i could extremely be a maximum cancers survivor then a man or woman "residing" with AIDS.
2016-11-07 06:51:19 · answer #7 · answered by goerdt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cancer .....aids/hiv can be prevented...did not used to be a problem...what does that tell you.....cancer can not be prevented...I pray that a cure will be soon to help those of our loved ones suffering from this very painful disease
2007-10-04 12:57:18 · answer #8 · answered by wilma s 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋